Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A review and comparison of strategies for multi-step ahead time series forecasting based on the NN5 forecasting competition
2012467 citationsSouhaib Ben Taieb, Gianluca Bontempi et al.Expert Systems with Applicationsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Antti Sorjamaa
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Antti Sorjamaa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antti Sorjamaa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antti Sorjamaa more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antti Sorjamaa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antti Sorjamaa. The network helps show where Antti Sorjamaa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Antti Sorjamaa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Antti Sorjamaa.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Antti Sorjamaa based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Antti Sorjamaa. Antti Sorjamaa is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Taieb, Souhaib Ben, Gianluca Bontempi, Amir F. Atiya, & Antti Sorjamaa. (2012). A review and comparison of strategies for multi-step ahead time series forecasting based on the NN5 forecasting competition. Expert Systems with Applications. 39(8). 7067–7083.467 indexed citations breakdown →
Sorjamaa, Antti, et al.. (2009). X-SOM and L-SOM: a Nested Approach for Missing Value Imputation. The European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks.3 indexed citations
8.
Sorjamaa, Antti, et al.. (2009). A Non-Linear Approach for Completing Missing Values in Temporal Databases. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 22(1). 99–117.3 indexed citations
9.
Taieb, Souhaib Ben, Antti Sorjamaa, Amaury Lendasse, & Gianluca Bontempi. (2009). Multiple-Output Modelling for Multi-Step-Ahead Forecasting.4 indexed citations
Sorjamaa, Antti & Yoan Miché. (2008). Tabu Search with Delta Test for Time Series Prediction using OP-KNN.3 indexed citations
13.
Yu, Qi, Antti Sorjamaa, Yoan Miché, & Éric Séverin. (2008). A methodology for time series prediction in Finance. 285–293.2 indexed citations
14.
Sorjamaa, Antti, et al.. (2007). SOM+EOF for finding missing values.. The European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks. 115–120.7 indexed citations
Sorjamaa, Antti & Amaury Lendasse. (2006). Time Series Prediction using DirRec Strategy. The European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks. 143–148.52 indexed citations
19.
Sorjamaa, Antti, Amaury Lendasse, & Michel Verleysen. (2005). Pruned Lazy Learning Models for Time Series Prediction. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)). 509–514.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.