António J. Santos
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Education top 2%
- Demography top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Brian E. VaughnManuela VeríssimoLígia MonteiroJoão R. DanielNuno TorresEmanuel J. GonçalvesRui F. OliveiraCarla Fernandes
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (62 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (31 papers)Early Childhood Education and Development (25 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEChild Development
- Partner nations
- PortugalUnited StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
António J. Santos
95 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Clinical Psychology 670
- Social Psychology 571
- Education 460
- Demography 169
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 162
Countries citing papers authored by António J. Santos
This map shows the geographic impact of António J. Santos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by António J. Santos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites António J. Santos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by António J. Santos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by António J. Santos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by António J. Santos. The network helps show where António J. Santos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of António J. Santos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of António J. Santos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of António J. Santos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with António J. Santos. António J. Santos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About António J. Santos
António J. Santos is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Developmental Biology, having authored 101 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (62 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (31 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (25 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (670 citations), Social Psychology (571 citations) and Education (460 citations). António J. Santos has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Brian E. Vaughn, Manuela Veríssimo, Lígia Monteiro, João R. Daniel, Nuno Torres, Emanuel J. Gonçalves, Rui F. Oliveira, Carla Fernandes, Nana Shin and F. Francis Strayer. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Child Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.