Antonio J. Pena
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ricardo C. CuryUdo HoffmannMaros FerencikSuhny AbbaraThomas J. BradyJohn H. NicholsFabian MoselewskiStephan Achenbach
- Topics
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (15 papers)Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (6 papers)Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingCritical Care and Intensive Care MedicineCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyCanada
In The Last Decade
Antonio J. Pena
17 papers receiving 774 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 725
- Biomedical Engineering 304
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 287
- Surgery 182
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 131
Countries citing papers authored by Antonio J. Pena
This map shows the geographic impact of Antonio J. Pena's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antonio J. Pena with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antonio J. Pena more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Antonio J. Pena
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antonio J. Pena. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antonio J. Pena. The network helps show where Antonio J. Pena may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Antonio J. Pena
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Antonio J. Pena. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Antonio J. Pena based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Antonio J. Pena. Antonio J. Pena is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 59 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 128 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 83 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 51 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 268 | |
| 16 | Cardiac CT in Emer- gency Department Patients with Acute Chest Pain 1 | 3 |
| 17 | INSTITUTO DE CIENCIAS DEL MAR | 3 |
About Antonio J. Pena
Antonio J. Pena is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 804 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (15 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (6 papers) and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (725 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (131 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (287 citations). Antonio J. Pena has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ricardo C. Cury, Udo Hoffmann, Maros Ferencik, Suhny Abbara, Thomas J. Brady, John H. Nichols, Fabian Moselewski, Stephan Achenbach, Claudia U. Chae and Javed Butler. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, The American Journal of Cardiology and American Heart Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.