Anton Galich

421 total citations
8 papers, 321 citations indexed

About

Anton Galich is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Anton Galich has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 321 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Surgery, 2 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Anton Galich's work include Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (2 papers) and Cancer-related gene regulation (2 papers). Anton Galich is often cited by papers focused on Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (2 papers) and Cancer-related gene regulation (2 papers). Anton Galich collaborates with scholars based in United States. Anton Galich's co-authors include Lynette M. Smith, K.C. Balaji, Meena Jaggi, Samuel P. Sterrett, John J. Baker, Sonny L. Johansson, Neil A. Abrahams, K.C. Balaji, David J. Smith and Wenguang Zhang and has published in prestigious journals such as Urology, The Prostate and World Journal of Urology.

In The Last Decade

Anton Galich

8 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anton Galich United States	7	146	121	112	71	64	8	321
Yi Liao China	14	211 1.4×	85 0.7×	65 0.6×	60 0.8×	34 0.5×	19	358
Kazuaki Machioka Japan	9	70 0.5×	149 1.2×	48 0.4×	116 1.6×	36 0.6×	14	321
Chen‐Chi Liu Taiwan	10	191 1.3×	97 0.8×	62 0.6×	119 1.7×	15 0.2×	15	399
Kathleen G. Higinbotham United States	7	303 2.1×	93 0.8×	38 0.3×	40 0.6×	41 0.6×	10	370
Bentao Shi China	10	148 1.0×	78 0.6×	83 0.7×	41 0.6×	34 0.5×	25	292
Markus Draaken Germany	14	171 1.2×	62 0.5×	188 1.7×	32 0.5×	99 1.5×	27	434
Miklós Szűcs Hungary	9	90 0.6×	91 0.8×	86 0.8×	46 0.6×	8 0.1×	39	263
Lauren Shuman United States	10	217 1.5×	127 1.0×	355 3.2×	104 1.5×	34 0.5×	16	491
Shushang Chen China	9	102 0.7×	211 1.7×	25 0.2×	22 0.3×	156 2.4×	16	360
Yoshiyuki Nagumo Japan	8	75 0.5×	64 0.5×	91 0.8×	35 0.5×	23 0.4×	48	238

Countries citing papers authored by Anton Galich

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anton Galich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anton Galich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anton Galich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anton Galich

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anton Galich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anton Galich. The network helps show where Anton Galich may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anton Galich

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anton Galich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anton Galich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anton Galich. Anton Galich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Hoyer-Klick, Carsten, et al.. (2022). Impact of Charging Behavior of Electric Vehicle Users on the Energy System. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

2.

Galich, Anton, et al.. (2007). Comparative analysis of early perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy by either the robotic or open method.. PubMed. 10(2). 145–50. 59 indexed citations

3.

Sterrett, Samuel P., et al.. (2006). Major urological oncological surgeries can be performed using minimally invasive robotic or laparoscopic methods with similar early perioperative outcomes compared to conventional open methods. World Journal of Urology. 25(2). 193–198. 12 indexed citations

4.

Smith, David J., Meena Jaggi, Wenguang Zhang, et al.. (2006). Metallothioneins and resistance to cisplatin and radiation in prostate cancer. Urology. 67(6). 1341–1347. 38 indexed citations

5.

Galich, Anton, et al.. (2006). Robotic urological surgery in patients with prior abdominal operations is not associated with increased complications. International Journal of Urology. 13(3). 248–251. 11 indexed citations

6.

Galich, Anton, et al.. (2006). Radical nephrectomy performed by open, laparoscopy with or without hand-assistance or robotic methods by the same surgeon produces comparable perioperative results. International braz j urol. 32(1). 15–22. 49 indexed citations

7.

Jaggi, Meena, Sonny L. Johansson, John J. Baker, et al.. (2005). Aberrant expression of E-cadherin and beta-catenin in human prostate cancer☆. Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations. 23(6). 402–406. 78 indexed citations

8.

Jaggi, Meena, Neil A. Abrahams, John J. Baker, et al.. (2005). N-cadherin switching occurs in high Gleason grade prostate cancer. The Prostate. 66(2). 193–199. 73 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact