Antje Petersen

456 total citations
11 papers, 195 citations indexed

About

Antje Petersen is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Antje Petersen has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 195 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 3 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Antje Petersen's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (8 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers) and Pregnancy-related medical research (3 papers). Antje Petersen is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (8 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers) and Pregnancy-related medical research (3 papers). Antje Petersen collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Antje Petersen's co-authors include Mechthild M. Groß, Frank Czubayko, Edlyn Soeth, Hartmut Juhl, Heinz-Joachim List, Thomas Wirth, Michael Neumaier, Rafael Mikolajczyk, Jagteshwar Grewal and Jun Zhang and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Frontiers in Medicine and Midwifery.

In The Last Decade

Antje Petersen

11 papers receiving 181 citations

Peers

Antje Petersen

OG

PPCH

PHEOH

SURGE

RNMI

D Grab Romania

Kecia Gaither United States

C. Gonthier France

Barbara Matarrelli Italy

Anthony Atallah France

Burak Karadağ Türkiye

Mauro Costa Italy

Ohad Feldstein Israel

P Bottone Italy

Loris Marin Italy

D Grab Romania

Antje Petersen

64 ×0.5

OG

98 ×1.0

PPCH

41 ×0.7

PHEOH

46 ×1.8

SURGE

6 ×0.3

RNMI

Citations per year, relative to Antje Petersen Antje Petersen (= 1×) peers D Grab

Countries citing papers authored by Antje Petersen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Antje Petersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antje Petersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antje Petersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Antje Petersen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antje Petersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antje Petersen. The network helps show where Antje Petersen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Antje Petersen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Antje Petersen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Antje Petersen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Antje Petersen. Antje Petersen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Gillmann, Hans-Jörg, et al.. (2019). Standardised electronic algorithms for monitoring prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Archives of Medical Science. 15(2). 408–415. 8 indexed citations

2.

Helbig, Sonja, et al.. (2019). Inter-institutional variations in oxytocin augmentation during labour in German university hospitals: a national survey. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 19(1). 238–238. 4 indexed citations

3.

Petersen, Antje, et al.. (2017). Outcomes geplanter außerklinischer und klinischer Low-Risk Geburten in Niedersachsen. Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie. 221(4). 187–197. 2 indexed citations

4.

Groß, Mechthild M., et al.. (2016). The dynamics of epidural and opioid analgesia during labour. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 294(5). 967–977. 8 indexed citations

5.

Mikolajczyk, Rafael, et al.. (2016). Early versus Late Admission to Labor Affects Labor Progression and Risk of Cesarean Section in Nulliparous Women. Frontiers in Medicine. 3. 26–26. 30 indexed citations

6.

Grylka‐Baeschlin, Susanne, Antje Petersen, André Karch, & Mechthild M. Groß. (2015). Labour duration and timing of interventions in women planning vaginal birth after caesarean section. Midwifery. 34. 221–229. 11 indexed citations

7.

Petersen, Antje, et al.. (2013). The sequence of intrapartum interventions: a descriptive approach to the cascade of interventions. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 288(2). 245–254. 46 indexed citations

8.

Petersen, Antje, et al.. (2012). Women's perception of the onset of labour and epidural analgesia: A prospective study. Midwifery. 29(4). 284–293. 17 indexed citations

9.

Petersen, Antje, et al.. (2010). The timing of interventions during labour: Descriptive results of a longitudinal study. Midwifery. 27(6). e267–e273. 14 indexed citations

10.

Groß, Mechthild M., et al.. (2009). Association between women's self-diagnosis of labor and labor duration after admission. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 38(1). 33–8. 10 indexed citations

11.

Soeth, Edlyn, Thomas Wirth, Heinz-Joachim List, et al.. (2001). Controlled ribozyme targeting demonstrates an antiapoptotic effect of carcinoembryonic antigen in HT29 colon cancer cells.. PubMed. 7(7). 2022–30. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact