Countries citing papers authored by Anthony Seldon
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony Seldon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony Seldon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony Seldon more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony Seldon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony Seldon. The network helps show where Anthony Seldon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anthony Seldon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anthony Seldon.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anthony Seldon based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anthony Seldon. Anthony Seldon is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kaufman, Scott Barry, Margaret L. Kern, Christian Krekel, et al.. (2017). The state of positive education. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).10 indexed citations
Seldon, Anthony, et al.. (1987). The winter of discontent. Contemporary Record. 1(3). 34–43.4 indexed citations
20.
Seldon, Anthony, et al.. (1983). By word of mouth: "élite" oral history.42 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.