Anson R. Main

1.6k total citations · 2 hit papers
15 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Anson R. Main is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Anson R. Main has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Insect Science, 14 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 10 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Anson R. Main's work include Plant and animal studies (14 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (14 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (10 papers). Anson R. Main is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (14 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (14 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (10 papers). Anson R. Main collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Anson R. Main's co-authors include Michelle L. Hladik, Dave Goulson, John V. Headley, Christy A. Morrissey, Kerry M. Peru, Nicole L. Michel, Elisabeth B. Webb, Doreen C. Mengel, Keith W. Goyne and Allan J. Cessna and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, PLoS ONE and The Science of The Total Environment.

In The Last Decade

Anson R. Main

15 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Environmental Risks and Challenges Associated with Neonic... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2018 2014 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anson R. Main United States 12 1.0k 580 439 211 192 15 1.2k
Michael C. Cavallaro United States 9 1.1k 1.1× 439 0.8× 378 0.9× 267 1.3× 320 1.7× 23 1.4k
Lennard Pisa United Kingdom 6 958 0.9× 615 1.1× 505 1.2× 230 1.1× 81 0.4× 6 1.1k
Madeleine Chagnon Canada 17 930 0.9× 810 1.4× 424 1.0× 403 1.9× 78 0.4× 24 1.3k
Elizabeth Y Long United States 10 1.6k 1.6× 889 1.5× 631 1.4× 441 2.1× 205 1.1× 17 1.8k
Colette Bertrand France 13 410 0.4× 382 0.7× 145 0.3× 267 1.3× 157 0.8× 21 798
D. A. Noome France 6 1.9k 1.9× 1.0k 1.8× 763 1.7× 563 2.7× 339 1.8× 6 2.3k
Maarten Bijleveld van Lexmond France 7 539 0.5× 290 0.5× 222 0.5× 152 0.7× 75 0.4× 7 652
Matteo Marzaro Italy 9 1.7k 1.7× 1.0k 1.8× 771 1.8× 386 1.8× 223 1.2× 9 1.8k
David Garthwaite United Kingdom 13 472 0.5× 373 0.6× 246 0.6× 180 0.9× 54 0.3× 24 713
Erin Jo Tiedeken Ireland 11 496 0.5× 563 1.0× 282 0.6× 226 1.1× 126 0.7× 11 874

Countries citing papers authored by Anson R. Main

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anson R. Main's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anson R. Main with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anson R. Main more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anson R. Main

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anson R. Main. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anson R. Main. The network helps show where Anson R. Main may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anson R. Main

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anson R. Main. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anson R. Main based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anson R. Main. Anson R. Main is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Woodward, Emily E., Michelle L. Hladik, Anson R. Main, et al.. (2022). Comparing imidacloprid, clothianidin, and azoxystrobin runoff from lettuce fields using a soil drench or treated seeds in the Salinas Valley, California. Environmental Pollution. 315. 120325–120325. 12 indexed citations
2.
Webb, Elisabeth B., et al.. (2022). Seed treatments containing neonicotinoids and fungicides reduce aquatic insect richness and abundance in midwestern USA–managed floodplain wetlands. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29(30). 45261–45275. 11 indexed citations
3.
Main, Anson R., et al.. (2021). Impacts of neonicotinoid seed treatments on the wild bee community in agricultural field margins. The Science of The Total Environment. 786. 147299–147299. 24 indexed citations
4.
Main, Anson R., Michelle L. Hladik, Elisabeth B. Webb, Keith W. Goyne, & Doreen C. Mengel. (2020). Beyond neonicotinoids – Wild pollinators are exposed to a range of pesticides while foraging in agroecosystems. The Science of The Total Environment. 742. 140436–140436. 67 indexed citations
5.
Cavallaro, Michael C., Anson R. Main, Karsten Liber, et al.. (2019). Neonicotinoids and other agricultural stressors collectively modify aquatic insect communities. Chemosphere. 226. 945–955. 33 indexed citations
6.
Main, Anson R., Elisabeth B. Webb, Keith W. Goyne, & Doreen C. Mengel. (2019). Reduced species richness of native bees in field margins associated with neonicotinoid concentrations in non-target soils. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 287. 106693–106693. 63 indexed citations
7.
Webb, Elisabeth B., et al.. (2019). Factors Influencing Neonicotinoid Insecticide Concentrations in Floodplain Wetland Sediments across Missouri. Environmental Science & Technology. 53(18). 10591–10600. 39 indexed citations
8.
Main, Anson R., Elisabeth B. Webb, Keith W. Goyne, & Doreen C. Mengel. (2019). Field-level characteristics influence wild bee functional guilds on public lands managed for conservation. Global Ecology and Conservation. 17. e00598–e00598. 8 indexed citations
9.
Main, Anson R., Elisabeth B. Webb, Keith W. Goyne, & Doreen C. Mengel. (2018). Neonicotinoid insecticides negatively affect performance measures of non‐target terrestrial arthropods: a meta‐analysis. Ecological Applications. 28(5). 1232–1244. 69 indexed citations
10.
Hladik, Michelle L., Anson R. Main, & Dave Goulson. (2018). Environmental Risks and Challenges Associated with Neonicotinoid Insecticides. Environmental Science & Technology. 52(6). 3329–3335. 433 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Main, Anson R., et al.. (2016). Reduction of neonicotinoid insecticide residues in Prairie wetlands by common wetland plants. The Science of The Total Environment. 579. 1193–1202. 30 indexed citations
12.
Main, Anson R., Nicole L. Michel, Michael C. Cavallaro, et al.. (2015). Snowmelt transport of neonicotinoid insecticides to Canadian Prairie wetlands. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 215. 76–84. 64 indexed citations
13.
Main, Anson R., Nicole L. Michel, John V. Headley, Kerry M. Peru, & Christy A. Morrissey. (2015). Ecological and Landscape Drivers of Neonicotinoid Insecticide Detections and Concentrations in Canada’s Prairie Wetlands. Environmental Science & Technology. 49(14). 8367–8376. 73 indexed citations
14.
Main, Anson R., John V. Headley, Kerry M. Peru, et al.. (2014). Widespread Use and Frequent Detection of Neonicotinoid Insecticides in Wetlands of Canada's Prairie Pothole Region. PLoS ONE. 9(3). e92821–e92821. 292 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Cavallaro, Michael C., Anson R. Main, & Christy A. Morrissey. (2014). Muskrat (<em>Ondatra zibethicus</em>) interference with aquatic invertebrate traps. The Canadian Field-Naturalist. 128(2). 200–200. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026