Ansie Fouché
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Administration top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Elmien TruterLinda TheronCarmit KatzSidnei Rinaldo Priolo FilhoGeorge M. TarabulsyAnnie BérubéSadiyya HaffejeeNatalia Varela
- Topics
- Child Abuse and Trauma (30 papers)Resilience and Mental Health (16 papers)Social Work Education and Practice (12 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBMC Public HealthChild Abuse & Neglect
- Partner nations
- South AfricaUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ansie Fouché
34 papers receiving 332 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Clinical Psychology 266
- General Health Professions 102
- Public Administration 80
- Sociology and Political Science 75
- Health 67
Countries citing papers authored by Ansie Fouché
This map shows the geographic impact of Ansie Fouché's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ansie Fouché with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ansie Fouché more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ansie Fouché
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ansie Fouché. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ansie Fouché. The network helps show where Ansie Fouché may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ansie Fouché
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ansie Fouché. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ansie Fouché based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ansie Fouché. Ansie Fouché is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 52 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | Requirements for evidence by a forensic social worker as set by the Supreme Court of Appeal | 1 |
| 18 | Indicators of resilience in resilient South African designated social workers: professional perspectives | 7 |
| 19 | Facilitating disclosure of child sexual abuse victims in the middle childhood : a seven-phase forensic interview protocol | 0 |
| 20 | Play techniques in the assessment of sexually abused black children | 2 |
About Ansie Fouché
Ansie Fouché is a scholar working on Public Administration, Clinical Psychology and Health, having authored 39 papers that have together received 346 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (30 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (16 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (80 citations), Clinical Psychology (266 citations) and Health (67 citations). Ansie Fouché has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United Arab Emirates and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elmien Truter, Linda Theron, Carmit Katz, Sidnei Rinaldo Priolo Filho, George M. Tarabulsy, Annie Bérubé, Sadiyya Haffejee, Natalia Varela, Nicola Christofides and Hannabeth Franchino-Olsen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BMC Public Health and Child Abuse & Neglect.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.