Anouk de Weger
About
In The Last Decade
Anouk de Weger
5 papers receiving 111 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 51
- Behavioral Neuroscience 24
- Cell Biology 24
- Molecular Biology 23
- Cognitive Neuroscience 14
Countries citing papers authored by Anouk de Weger
This map shows the geographic impact of Anouk de Weger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anouk de Weger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anouk de Weger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anouk de Weger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anouk de Weger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anouk de Weger. The network helps show where Anouk de Weger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anouk de Weger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anouk de Weger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anouk de Weger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anouk de Weger. Anouk de Weger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 90 | |
| 6 | 15 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.