Anne‐Lore Schlaitz

459 total citations
9 papers, 341 citations indexed

About

Anne‐Lore Schlaitz is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and Aging. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne‐Lore Schlaitz has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 341 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Cell Biology, 7 papers in Molecular Biology and 1 paper in Aging. Recurrent topics in Anne‐Lore Schlaitz's work include Cellular transport and secretion (6 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (6 papers) and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (3 papers). Anne‐Lore Schlaitz is often cited by papers focused on Cellular transport and secretion (6 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (6 papers) and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (3 papers). Anne‐Lore Schlaitz collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Finland. Anne‐Lore Schlaitz's co-authors include John R. Yates, Rebecca Heald, James Thompson, Catherine C. L. Wong, Yannis Kalaidzidis, Andrej Shevchenko, Jan Havliš, Lars Demmel, Yvonne Gloor and Eberhard Krause and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, The Journal of Cell Biology and Molecular and Cellular Biology.

In The Last Decade

Anne‐Lore Schlaitz

9 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anne‐Lore Schlaitz Germany 8 261 208 34 34 18 9 341
Laurent Chesneau France 6 244 0.9× 336 1.6× 26 0.8× 32 0.9× 16 0.9× 10 413
Evgueni A. Sevrioukov United States 10 264 1.0× 189 0.9× 17 0.5× 33 1.0× 63 3.5× 15 423
Moshe S. Kim Canada 5 223 0.9× 125 0.6× 29 0.9× 13 0.4× 26 1.4× 7 280
Deborah J. Frank United States 9 299 1.1× 106 0.5× 46 1.4× 27 0.8× 33 1.8× 15 431
Mika Toya Japan 16 486 1.9× 384 1.8× 51 1.5× 74 2.2× 26 1.4× 30 628
Sonja Stenmark Sweden 11 389 1.5× 279 1.3× 23 0.7× 28 0.8× 32 1.8× 11 462
André Franz Germany 8 291 1.1× 153 0.7× 19 0.6× 20 0.6× 17 0.9× 8 343
Melissa N. Locke United States 9 455 1.7× 194 0.9× 23 0.7× 36 1.1× 12 0.7× 11 512
Alexander Springhorn Germany 7 219 0.8× 107 0.5× 63 1.9× 22 0.6× 44 2.4× 7 322
Suzanne E. M. van der Horst Netherlands 6 188 0.7× 111 0.5× 29 0.9× 20 0.6× 35 1.9× 6 280

Countries citing papers authored by Anne‐Lore Schlaitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne‐Lore Schlaitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne‐Lore Schlaitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne‐Lore Schlaitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne‐Lore Schlaitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne‐Lore Schlaitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne‐Lore Schlaitz. The network helps show where Anne‐Lore Schlaitz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne‐Lore Schlaitz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne‐Lore Schlaitz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne‐Lore Schlaitz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne‐Lore Schlaitz. Anne‐Lore Schlaitz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Schlaitz, Anne‐Lore, et al.. (2024). Dynamic remodelling of the endoplasmic reticulum for mitosis. Journal of Cell Science. 137(22). 2 indexed citations
2.
Brunner, Andreas, et al.. (2021). Reticulon-like REEP4 at the inner nuclear membrane promotes nuclear pore complex formation. The Journal of Cell Biology. 221(2). 11 indexed citations
3.
Kumar, Darshan, et al.. (2019). REEP3 and REEP4 determine the tubular morphology of the endoplasmic reticulum during mitosis. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 30(12). 1377–1389. 34 indexed citations
4.
Strzelecka, Magdalena, et al.. (2016). A versatile multivariate image analysis pipeline reveals features ofXenopusextract spindles. The Journal of Cell Biology. 213(1). 127–136. 11 indexed citations
5.
Schlaitz, Anne‐Lore. (2014). Microtubules as key coordinators of nuclear envelope and endoplasmic reticulum dynamics during mitosis. BioEssays. 36(7). 665–671. 11 indexed citations
6.
Schlaitz, Anne‐Lore, James Thompson, Catherine C. L. Wong, John R. Yates, & Rebecca Heald. (2013). REEP3/4 Ensure Endoplasmic Reticulum Clearance from Metaphase Chromatin and Proper Nuclear Envelope Architecture. Developmental Cell. 26(3). 315–323. 104 indexed citations
7.
Demmel, Lars, Mike Beck, Christian Klose, et al.. (2008). Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling of the Golgi Phosphatidylinositol 4-Kinase Pik1 Is Regulated by 14-3-3 Proteins and Coordinates Golgi Function with Cell Growth. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 19(3). 1046–1061. 55 indexed citations
8.
Demmel, Lars, Mike Beck, Christian Klose, et al.. (2008). Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling of the Golgi Phosphatidylinositol 4-Kinase Pik1 Is Regulated by 14-3-3 Proteins and Coordinates Golgi Function with Cell Growth. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 19(3). 37 indexed citations
9.
Schlaitz, Anne‐Lore, Martin Srayko, Alexander Dammermann, et al.. (2007). The C. elegans RSA Complex Localizes Protein Phosphatase 2A to Centrosomes and Regulates Mitotic Spindle Assembly. Cell. 128(1). 115–127. 76 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026