Anneloes E. Bohte
- Epidemiology top 2%
- Hepatology top 1%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Jaap StokerJochem R. van WervenShandra BipatAart J. NederveenPeter L. M. JansenPatrick AsbachJayant A. TalwalkarDavid J. Lomas
- Topics
- Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers)Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (4 papers)Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsFranceJapan
In The Last Decade
Anneloes E. Bohte
15 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Epidemiology 1.1k
- Hepatology 645
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 240
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 216
- Surgery 160
Countries citing papers authored by Anneloes E. Bohte
This map shows the geographic impact of Anneloes E. Bohte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anneloes E. Bohte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anneloes E. Bohte more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anneloes E. Bohte
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anneloes E. Bohte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anneloes E. Bohte. The network helps show where Anneloes E. Bohte may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anneloes E. Bohte
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anneloes E. Bohte. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anneloes E. Bohte based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anneloes E. Bohte. Anneloes E. Bohte is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 51 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Staging Liver Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Databreakdown → | 414 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 76 | |
| 10 | 64 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 59 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 417 |
About Anneloes E. Bohte
Anneloes E. Bohte is a scholar working on Hepatology, Epidemiology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (4 papers) and Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (645 citations), Epidemiology (1.1k citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (240 citations). Anneloes E. Bohte has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Jaap Stoker, Jochem R. van Werven, Shandra Bipat, Aart J. Nederveen, Peter L. M. Jansen, Patrick Asbach, Jayant A. Talwalkar, David J. Lomas, Utaroh Motosugi and Siddharth Singh. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Radiology and The American Journal of Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.