Anne‐Lise Kamper
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 1%
- Nephrology top 0.5%
- Internal Medicine top 1%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Svend StrandgaardKristine HommelChristian Torp‐PedersenGunnar GislasonJonas Bjerring OlesenGregory Y.H. LipLars KøberDeirdre A. Lane
- Topics
- Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (20 papers)Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (16 papers)Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- DenmarkUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Anne‐Lise Kamper
98 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.5k
- Nephrology 826
- Internal Medicine 414
- Epidemiology 369
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 331
Countries citing papers authored by Anne‐Lise Kamper
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne‐Lise Kamper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne‐Lise Kamper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne‐Lise Kamper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne‐Lise Kamper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne‐Lise Kamper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne‐Lise Kamper. The network helps show where Anne‐Lise Kamper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne‐Lise Kamper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne‐Lise Kamper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne‐Lise Kamper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne‐Lise Kamper. Anne‐Lise Kamper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 45 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 118 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 37 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 87 |
About Anne‐Lise Kamper
Anne‐Lise Kamper is a scholar working on Nephrology, Internal Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 108 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (20 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (16 papers) and Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (826 citations), Internal Medicine (414 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.5k citations). Anne‐Lise Kamper has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Svend Strandgaard, Kristine Hommel, Christian Torp‐Pedersen, Gunnar Gislason, Jonas Bjerring Olesen, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Lars Køber, Deirdre A. Lane, Jesper Lindhardsen and Paul P. Leyssac. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.