Annelisa Marsella
About
In The Last Decade
Annelisa Marsella
5 papers receiving 92 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Cancer Research 52
- Oncology 49
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 26
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 12
- Radiation 12
Countries citing papers authored by Annelisa Marsella
This map shows the geographic impact of Annelisa Marsella's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annelisa Marsella with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annelisa Marsella more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annelisa Marsella
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annelisa Marsella. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annelisa Marsella. The network helps show where Annelisa Marsella may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annelisa Marsella
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annelisa Marsella. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annelisa Marsella based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annelisa Marsella. Annelisa Marsella is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 22 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.