Annelie Maaß

916 total citations
9 papers, 733 citations indexed

About

Annelie Maaß is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Annelie Maaß has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 733 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Ophthalmology, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Annelie Maaß's work include Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (2 papers). Annelie Maaß is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (2 papers). Annelie Maaß collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Germany. Annelie Maaß's co-authors include T.E. Salt, Stephen E. Moss, M. Francesca Cordeiro, Li Guo, Vy Luong, F.W. Fitzke, Fred W. Fitzke, William Cheung, Michael E. Cheetham and Françoise Russo‐Marie and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Microbiology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

In The Last Decade

Annelie Maaß

9 papers receiving 717 citations

Peers

Annelie Maaß
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Ophthalmology 504
  • Molecular Biology 413
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 167
  • Neurology 123
  • Physiology 90
Replace Venkata Ramana Murthy Chavali with:
Venkata Ramana Murthy Chavali United States
Fengjuan Gao China
Emma Kettle Australia
Ivana Ivković France
Colin A. Bretz United States
Colleen M. McDowell United States
Kelly Ahern United States
N. L. Hawes United States
Liliana Mizrahi‐Meissonnier Israel
Aline Antonio France
Venkata Ramana Murthy Chavali United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Annelie Maaß
Annelie Maaß · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Annelie Maaß
Annelie Maaß · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Annelie Maaß

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annelie Maaß's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annelie Maaß with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annelie Maaß more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annelie Maaß

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annelie Maaß. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annelie Maaß. The network helps show where Annelie Maaß may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annelie Maaß

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annelie Maaß. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annelie Maaß based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annelie Maaß. Annelie Maaß is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 42
2 56
3 270
4 170
5
In–vivo Retinal Imaging and Anatomical Findings in Aged Animals Lacking the Gene for Complement Factor–H
1
6 10
7 141
8
Retinal Ganglion Cell Apoptosis and Loss Assessed in vivo Using the ERG
1
9 42

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026