This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Lacheret's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Lacheret with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Lacheret more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Lacheret. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Lacheret. The network helps show where Anne Lacheret may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Lacheret
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Lacheret.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Lacheret based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Lacheret. Anne Lacheret is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lacheret, Anne & Dominique Legallois. (2013). Expressivité vocale et grammaire : comment le symbolique construit le prosodique. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 45–56.
6.
Gerdes, Kim, et al.. (2012). Intonosyntactic Data Structures: The Rhapsodie Treebank of Spoken French. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 85–94.2 indexed citations
Lacheret, Anne & Jacques François. (2010). De la notion de détachement topical à celle de constituant thématique extrapropositionnel. OpenEdition (OpenEdition).2 indexed citations
11.
Avanzi, Mathieu, Cédric Gendrot, & Anne Lacheret. (2010). Is there a prosodic difference between left-dislocated and heavy subjects? Evidence from spontaneous speech. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 20–30.6 indexed citations
Lacheret, Anne, Nicolas Obin, & Xavier Rodet. (2008). Un modèle de durées des syllabes fondé sur leurs propriétés intrinsèques et les variations locales de débit. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).1 indexed citations
14.
Avanzi, Mathieu, Anne Lacheret, & Bernard Victorri. (2008). Analor, un outil d'aide pour la modélisation de l'interface prosodie-grammaire. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 27–46.7 indexed citations
15.
Lacheret, Anne & Marie‐Thérèse Le Normand. (2008). Prosodie et acquisition du langage chez les enfants implantés cochléaires. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).1 indexed citations
16.
Lacheret, Anne, Mathieu Avanzi, Jean-Philippe Goldman, Anne-Catherine Simon, & Antoine Auchlin. (2007). Méthodologie et algorithmiques pour la détection automatique des syllabes proéminentes dans les corpus de français parlé. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 13(2). 2–30.2 indexed citations
17.
Lacheret, Anne, et al.. (2007). Comment évaluer la nucléarité du lieu dans les constructions locatives ? Les indices prosodiques à la rescousse des critères syntaxico-sémantiques. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 125–141.1 indexed citations
Lacheret, Anne. (2003). Focalisation et circonstance : que nous dit la prosodie du français parlé ?. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 137–160.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.