Anne L. Engh
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.5%
- Developmental Biology top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Ecology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Dorothy L. CheneyRobert M. SeyfarthThore J. BergmanJacinta C. BeehnerLiza R. MoscoviceRoman M. WittigCatherine CrockfordJoan B. Silk
- Topics
- Primate Behavior and Ecology (17 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (11 papers)Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomBelgium
In The Last Decade
Anne L. Engh
21 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Social Psychology 1.7k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.2k
- Developmental Biology 632
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 577
- Ecology 434
Countries citing papers authored by Anne L. Engh
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne L. Engh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne L. Engh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne L. Engh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne L. Engh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne L. Engh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne L. Engh. The network helps show where Anne L. Engh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne L. Engh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne L. Engh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne L. Engh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne L. Engh. Anne L. Engh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Strong and Consistent Social Bonds Enhance the Longevity of Female Baboonsbreakdown → | 541 |
| 6 | 165 | |
| 7 | 477 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 118 | |
| 11 | 58 | |
| 12 | 192 | |
| 13 | 86 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 118 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 111 | |
| 19 | 127 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About Anne L. Engh
Anne L. Engh is a scholar working on Developmental Biology, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (17 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (11 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (632 citations), Social Psychology (1.7k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.2k citations). Anne L. Engh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Dorothy L. Cheney, Robert M. Seyfarth, Thore J. Bergman, Jacinta C. Beehner, Liza R. Moscovice, Roman M. Wittig, Catherine Crockford, Joan B. Silk, Kay E. Holekamp and Patricia L. Whitten. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Molecular Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.