Anne K. Ludwig

770 total citations
9 papers, 442 citations indexed

About

Anne K. Ludwig is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Virology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne K. Ludwig has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 442 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Genetics and 2 papers in Virology. Recurrent topics in Anne K. Ludwig's work include RNA modifications and cancer (7 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (5 papers) and RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (3 papers). Anne K. Ludwig is often cited by papers focused on RNA modifications and cancer (7 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (5 papers) and RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (3 papers). Anne K. Ludwig collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Portugal and Australia. Anne K. Ludwig's co-authors include M. Cristina Cardoso, Henry D. Herce, Heinrich Leonhardt, Robert M. Martin, Gisela Lättig-Tünnemann, Marion Fillies, Eberhard Krause, Christian P. R. Hackenberger, Dominik Schumacher and Gohar Ter‐Avetisyan and has published in prestigious journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Nature Communications and Nature Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Anne K. Ludwig

9 papers receiving 439 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anne K. Ludwig Germany	6	377	67	62	41	29	9	442
Marion Fillies Germany	6	312 0.8×	44 0.7×	65 1.0×	38 0.9×	25 0.9×	7	388
Hau B. Nguyen United States	12	400 1.1×	76 1.1×	56 0.9×	30 0.7×	60 2.1×	25	646
Michael Rheinnecker Germany	9	380 1.0×	40 0.6×	75 1.2×	30 0.7×	33 1.1×	13	485
Zachary T. Britton United States	5	383 1.0×	55 0.8×	147 2.4×	19 0.5×	22 0.8×	8	483
Anja van Brabant Smith United States	13	695 1.8×	109 1.6×	36 0.6×	21 0.5×	23 0.8×	17	768
Glenna Foight United States	7	311 0.8×	22 0.3×	42 0.7×	37 0.9×	28 1.0×	10	388
Nina Bohlke Germany	6	350 0.9×	56 0.8×	34 0.5×	72 1.8×	17 0.6×	6	382
Adam J. Stevens United States	8	409 1.1×	40 0.6×	68 1.1×	44 1.1×	16 0.6×	11	472
Leila Peraro United States	11	512 1.4×	64 1.0×	59 1.0×	114 2.8×	46 1.6×	14	612
Davide Proverbio Germany	13	419 1.1×	52 0.8×	99 1.6×	22 0.5×	35 1.2×	15	482

Countries citing papers authored by Anne K. Ludwig

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne K. Ludwig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne K. Ludwig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne K. Ludwig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne K. Ludwig

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne K. Ludwig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne K. Ludwig. The network helps show where Anne K. Ludwig may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne K. Ludwig

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne K. Ludwig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne K. Ludwig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne K. Ludwig. Anne K. Ludwig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Schelter, Florian, et al.. (2022). Isoform-specific and ubiquitination dependent recruitment of Tet1 to replicating heterochromatin modulates methylcytosine oxidation. Nature Communications. 13(1). 5173–5173. 10 indexed citations

2.

Herce, Henry D., Dominik Schumacher, Anselm F. L. Schneider, et al.. (2017). Cell-permeable nanobodies for targeted immunolabelling and antigen manipulation in living cells. Nature Chemistry. 9(8). 762–771. 220 indexed citations

3.

Zhang, Peng, Anne K. Ludwig, Ines Hellmann, et al.. (2017). L1 retrotransposition is activated by Ten-eleven-translocation protein 1 and repressed by methyl-CpG binding proteins. Nucleus. 8(5). 548–562. 20 indexed citations

4.

Zhang, Peng, et al.. (2017). DNA base flipping analytical pipeline. Biology Methods and Protocols. 2(1). bpx010–bpx010. 3 indexed citations

5.

Ludwig, Anne K., Peng Zhang, Stephanie Meyer, et al.. (2016). Binding of MBD proteins to DNA blocks Tet1 function thereby modulating transcriptional noise. Nucleic Acids Research. 45(5). 2438–2457. 33 indexed citations

6.

Martin, Robert M., Henry D. Herce, Anne K. Ludwig, & M. Cristina Cardoso. (2016). Visualization of the Nucleolus in Living Cells with Cell-Penetrating Fluorescent Peptides. Methods in molecular biology. 1455. 71–82. 4 indexed citations

7.

Ludwig, Anne K., Peng Zhang, & M. Cristina Cardoso. (2016). Modifiers and Readers of DNA Modifications and Their Impact on Genome Structure, Expression, and Stability in Disease. Frontiers in Genetics. 7. 115–115. 42 indexed citations

8.

Srivastava, Sameer, Anne K. Ludwig, Jason W.H. Wong, & Luke B. Hesson. (2016). An investigation of the potential for epigenetic inactivation by transcription read-through in a sporadic colorectal cancer. Gene. 585(1). 154–158. 4 indexed citations

9.

Martin, Robert M., Gohar Ter‐Avetisyan, Henry D. Herce, et al.. (2015). Principles of protein targeting to the nucleolus. Nucleus. 6(4). 314–325. 106 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact