Anne E. Menkens

1.1k total citations
21 papers, 880 citations indexed

About

Anne E. Menkens is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne E. Menkens has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 880 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 6 papers in Molecular Biology and 5 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Anne E. Menkens's work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (6 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers). Anne E. Menkens is often cited by papers focused on Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (6 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers). Anne E. Menkens collaborates with scholars based in United States. Anne E. Menkens's co-authors include Anthony R. Cashmore, Ulrike Schindler, Holger Beckmann, Joseph R. Ecker, Kenneth N. Kreuzer, Daniel C. Sullivan, W Y Yap, Laurence P. Clarke, Arvind Chopra and Michael V. Knopp and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and The EMBO Journal.

In The Last Decade

Anne E. Menkens

21 papers receiving 864 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anne E. Menkens United States 10 610 529 120 96 50 21 880
James W. Kenny United States 14 673 1.1× 147 0.3× 64 0.5× 117 1.2× 43 0.9× 14 903
Yongxiang Gao China 17 506 0.8× 244 0.5× 16 0.1× 105 1.1× 14 0.3× 51 732
S. Schlehuber Germany 10 324 0.5× 148 0.3× 224 1.9× 18 0.2× 20 0.4× 15 613
Qingchun Zhou China 16 272 0.4× 89 0.2× 53 0.4× 88 0.9× 12 0.2× 44 566
Martina O’Flaherty Netherlands 11 600 1.0× 390 0.7× 12 0.1× 25 0.3× 26 0.5× 17 933
Masaya Oki Japan 19 885 1.5× 165 0.3× 17 0.1× 126 1.3× 160 3.2× 59 998
Pascal Martinez France 12 504 0.8× 118 0.2× 24 0.2× 23 0.2× 29 0.6× 14 605
Manfred Watzele Germany 11 415 0.7× 58 0.1× 59 0.5× 47 0.5× 16 0.3× 14 584
Johann Weser Germany 11 434 0.7× 80 0.2× 25 0.2× 65 0.7× 14 0.3× 11 698
Simon Messing United States 15 634 1.0× 148 0.3× 24 0.2× 62 0.6× 28 0.6× 27 814

Countries citing papers authored by Anne E. Menkens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne E. Menkens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne E. Menkens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne E. Menkens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne E. Menkens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne E. Menkens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne E. Menkens. The network helps show where Anne E. Menkens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne E. Menkens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne E. Menkens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne E. Menkens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne E. Menkens. Anne E. Menkens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Shan, Liang, et al.. (2012). Characterization of nanoparticle-based contrast agents for molecular magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 14(9). 14 indexed citations
2.
Chopra, Arvind, et al.. (2012). Essential Parameters to Consider for The Characterization of Optical Imaging Probes. Nanomedicine. 7(7). 1101–1107. 10 indexed citations
3.
Chopra, Arvind, et al.. (2011). Molecular Imaging and Contrast Agent Database (MICAD): Evolution and Progress. Molecular Imaging and Biology. 14(1). 4–13. 34 indexed citations
4.
Chopra, Arvind, et al.. (2010). Molecular imaging and contrast agent database (MICAD): Progress and current status. 51. 1043–1043. 2 indexed citations
5.
Menkens, Anne E., et al.. (2007). NIH MICAD initiative and guest author program opportunities.. PubMed. 48(5). 19N–19N. 4 indexed citations
6.
Beck, Belinda R., et al.. (2007). Molecular Imaging and Contrast Agent Database (MICAD): Progress and accomplishments. 48. 1 indexed citations
7.
Sloane, Bonnie F., Robert J. Gillies, Suresh Mohla, et al.. (2006). I2 Imaging: Cancer Biology and the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancer Research. 66(23). 11097–11099. 6 indexed citations
8.
Evelhoch, Jeffrey L., Michael Garwood, Daniel B. Vigneron, et al.. (2005). Expanding the Use of Magnetic Resonance in the Assessment of Tumor Response to Therapy: Workshop Report. Cancer Research. 65(16). 7041–7044. 71 indexed citations
9.
Gillies, Robert J., John M. Hoffman, Kit S. Lam, et al.. (2005). Meeting Report: High-Throughput Technologies for In Vivo Imaging Agents. Molecular Imaging. 4(2). 98–103. 6 indexed citations
10.
Clarke, Laurence P., et al.. (2000). National cancer institute initiative for development of novel imaging technologies. Academic Radiology. 7(6). 481–483. 6 indexed citations
11.
Staab, Edward V., et al.. (2000). Training the next generation of imaging scientists and clinicians. Academic Radiology. 7(8). 678–680. 7 indexed citations
12.
Hoffman, John M. & Anne E. Menkens. (2000). Molecular imaging in cancer: Future directions and goals of the national cancer institute. Academic Radiology. 7(10). 905–907. 12 indexed citations
13.
Sullivan, Daniel C. & Anne E. Menkens. (2000). Status of funding programs. Academic Radiology. 7(4). 306–308. 1 indexed citations
14.
Bragg, David G., Daniel Sullivan, & Anne E. Menkens. (1999). Radiologic sciences research in the next century: New national initiatives and evolving university and industrial relationships. Academic Radiology. 6(9). 552–558. 1 indexed citations
15.
Menkens, Anne E., Ulrike Schindler, & Anthony R. Cashmore. (1995). The G-box: a ubiquitous regulatory DNA element in plants bound by the GBF family of bZIP proteins. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 20(12). 506–510. 341 indexed citations
16.
Menkens, Anne E. & Anthony R. Cashmore. (1994). Isolation and characterization of a fourth Arabidopsis thaliana G-box-binding factor, which has similarities to Fos oncoprotein.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 91(7). 2522–2526. 66 indexed citations
17.
Schindler, Ulrike, Anne E. Menkens, & Anthony R. Cashmore. (1992). GBF-1, GBF-2 and GBF-3: three Arabidopsis b-Zip proteins that interact with the light-regulated rbcS-1A promoter.. 289–304. 1 indexed citations
18.
Schindler, Ulrike, Anne E. Menkens, Holger Beckmann, Joseph R. Ecker, & Anthony R. Cashmore. (1992). Heterodimerization between light-regulated and ubiquitously expressed Arabidopsis GBF bZIP proteins.. The EMBO Journal. 11(4). 1261–1273. 218 indexed citations
19.
Kreuzer, Kenneth N., et al.. (1988). Recombination-dependent replication of plasmids during bacteriophage T4 infection.. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 263(23). 11366–11373. 44 indexed citations
20.
Menkens, Anne E. & Kenneth N. Kreuzer. (1988). Deletion analysis of bacteriophage T4 tertiary origins. A promoter sequence is required for a rifampicin-resistant replication origin.. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 263(23). 11358–11365. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026