Anne Bobb

555 total citations
8 papers, 417 citations indexed

About

Anne Bobb is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne Bobb has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 417 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Health Information Management, 2 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology and 2 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Anne Bobb's work include Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers). Anne Bobb is often cited by papers focused on Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers). Anne Bobb collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Vietnam. Anne Bobb's co-authors include Joe Feinglass, Paul R. Yarnold, Gary A. Noskin, M Hüsch, Kristine M. Gleason, Thomas H. Payne, Gilad J. Kuperman, Robert A. Jenders, Allen J. Vaida and David W. Bates and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

In The Last Decade

Anne Bobb

8 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anne Bobb United States	6	223	209	204	69	43	8	417
Matthew Ditmore United States	3	193 0.9×	172 0.8×	261 1.3×	75 1.1×	19 0.4×	3	442
Allen J. Vaida United States	13	95 0.4×	173 0.8×	157 0.8×	53 0.8×	34 0.8×	28	388
Eric Pifer United States	7	251 1.1×	126 0.6×	77 0.4×	95 1.4×	44 1.0×	8	384
Rianne J. Zaal Netherlands	13	148 0.7×	321 1.5×	203 1.0×	32 0.5×	35 0.8×	20	490
Jos Aarts Netherlands	8	224 1.0×	123 0.6×	74 0.4×	103 1.5×	32 0.7×	17	356
Heleen van der Sijs Netherlands	13	223 1.0×	167 0.8×	90 0.4×	136 2.0×	36 0.8×	31	565
Rosemary Burke Australia	9	241 1.1×	181 0.9×	157 0.8×	60 0.9×	26 0.6×	24	363
James R. Guidry United States	7	138 0.6×	155 0.7×	165 0.8×	96 1.4×	20 0.5×	8	384
Jasperien E. van Doormaal Netherlands	9	142 0.6×	237 1.1×	180 0.9×	29 0.4×	13 0.3×	9	342
Nivethietha Maniam United States	6	140 0.6×	123 0.6×	66 0.3×	103 1.5×	25 0.6×	8	336

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Bobb

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Bobb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Bobb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Bobb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Bobb

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Bobb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Bobb. The network helps show where Anne Bobb may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Bobb

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Bobb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Bobb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Bobb. Anne Bobb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Williams, Emmanuelle, Matthew Coates, Andrew Tinsley, et al.. (2017). Formalized IBD Transition Clinic Leads to High Retention and Low No Show Rates of Young Adults in a Single Tertiary Center. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 112. S388–S388. 7 indexed citations

2.

Desai, Meeta, Emmanuelle Williams, Walter A. Koltun, et al.. (2016). P-086 Improvements in Patient Access and No-Show Rates Seen with an IBD Nurse Navigator. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 22. S36–S36. 1 indexed citations

3.

Ryscavage, Patrick, et al.. (2011). Incidence and Impact of False-Positive Urine Pneumococcal Antigen Testing in Hospitalized Patients. Southern Medical Journal. 104(8). 593–597. 2 indexed citations

4.

Wright, Adam, Gilad J. Kuperman, Allen J. Vaida, et al.. (2011). Towards Meaningful Medication-Related Clinical Decision Support: Recommendations for an Initial Implementation. Applied Clinical Informatics. 2(1). 50–62. 23 indexed citations

5.

Jenders, Robert A., Anne Bobb, John Halamka, et al.. (2010). Best Practices in Clinical Decision Support. Applied Clinical Informatics. 1(3). 331–345. 32 indexed citations

6.

Coté, Gregory A., John P. Rice, William J. Bulsiewicz, et al.. (2008). Use of Physician Education and Computer Alert to Improve Targeted Use of Gastroprotection Among NSAID Users. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 103(5). 1097–1103. 28 indexed citations

7.

Bobb, Anne, et al.. (2006). Viewpoint: Controversies Surrounding Use of Order Sets for Clinical Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order Entry. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 14(1). 41–47. 49 indexed citations

8.

Bobb, Anne, Kristine M. Gleason, M Hüsch, et al.. (2004). The Epidemiology of Prescribing Errors. Archives of Internal Medicine. 164(7). 785–785. 275 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact