Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz
- Molecular Biology
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Materials Chemistry
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- Wilfred F. van GunsterenDaniel TrzesniakSereina RinikerJane R. AllisonNathan SchmidMarkus ChristenDaan P. GeerkePhilippe H. Hünenberger
- Topics
- Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (10 papers)Protein Structure and Dynamics (6 papers)DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and OpticsPhysical and Theoretical ChemistryFiltration and Separation
- Journals
- The Journal of Chemical PhysicsThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandChinaSlovenia
In The Last Decade
Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz
13 papers receiving 575 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Molecular Biology 306
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 271
- Materials Chemistry 157
- Spectroscopy 95
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 71
Countries citing papers authored by Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz. The network helps show where Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz. Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 45 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 101 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 52 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 76 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 227 | |
| 13 | 31 |
About Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz
Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Catalysis, having authored 13 papers that have together received 590 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (10 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (6 papers) and DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (271 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (71 citations) and Filtration and Separation (16 citations). Anna‐Pitschna E. Kunz has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, China and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Wilfred F. van Gunsteren, Daniel Trzesniak, Sereina Riniker, Jane R. Allison, Nathan Schmid, Markus Christen, Daan P. Geerke, Philippe H. Hünenberger, Bruno A. C. Horta and Andreas P. Eichenberger. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and The Journal of Physical Chemistry A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.