Annalisa Volpi
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Dino AmadoriOriana NanniEmanuela ScarpiLaura MedriAnna Maria GranatoFranca De PaolaDonata Casadei GiunchiD. Amadori
- Topics
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (15 papers)HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (11 papers)Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Annalisa Volpi
34 papers receiving 639 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Oncology 402
- Cancer Research 300
- Molecular Biology 264
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 135
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 92
Countries citing papers authored by Annalisa Volpi
This map shows the geographic impact of Annalisa Volpi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annalisa Volpi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annalisa Volpi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annalisa Volpi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annalisa Volpi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annalisa Volpi. The network helps show where Annalisa Volpi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annalisa Volpi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annalisa Volpi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annalisa Volpi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annalisa Volpi. Annalisa Volpi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | HER-2 expression and cell proliferation: Prognostic markers in patients with node-negative breast cancer | 10 |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | L'angiogenesi nel carcinoma della mammella | 1 |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | Prospective use of tumor proliferative activity for adjuvant therapy in node-negative breast cancer patients | 1 |
| 13 | 55 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | [Effect of the resection margin and the extrarectal spread on the recurrence following 2 types of surgical procedures in rectal cancer]. | 1 |
| 20 | 10 |
About Annalisa Volpi
Annalisa Volpi is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 34 papers that have together received 665 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (15 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (11 papers) and Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (300 citations), Oncology (402 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (135 citations). Annalisa Volpi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Dino Amadori, Oriana Nanni, Emanuela Scarpi, Laura Medri, Anna Maria Granato, Franca De Paola, Donata Casadei Giunchi, D. Amadori, Franco Monti and Andrea Amadori. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.