Anna W. Schoettle

4.2k total citations
102 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

Anna W. Schoettle is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna W. Schoettle has authored 102 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 53 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 48 papers in Ecology and 37 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Anna W. Schoettle's work include Fire effects on ecosystems (35 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (33 papers) and Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (21 papers). Anna W. Schoettle is often cited by papers focused on Fire effects on ecosystems (35 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (33 papers) and Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (21 papers). Anna W. Schoettle collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Mexico. Anna W. Schoettle's co-authors include Peter B. Reich, Ronald Amundson, Richard A. Sniezko, William K. Smith, Michael G. Ryan, Barbara J. Yoder, M. R. Kaufmann, Richard H. Waring, Jonathan D. Coop and Hans F. Stroo and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The Plant Journal and Oecologia.

In The Last Decade

Anna W. Schoettle

92 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna W. Schoettle United States 30 1.9k 1.2k 1.1k 812 761 102 2.9k
J. A. Pardos Spain 30 1.6k 0.8× 1.5k 1.2× 1.1k 0.9× 345 0.4× 658 0.9× 64 2.5k
Annabel J. Porté France 18 1.2k 0.6× 953 0.8× 770 0.7× 445 0.5× 505 0.7× 29 2.1k
Dušan Gömöry Slovakia 28 797 0.4× 1.2k 1.0× 1.5k 1.3× 716 0.9× 711 0.9× 144 3.6k
Jesús Rodríguez‐Calcerrada Spain 29 1.4k 0.8× 942 0.8× 957 0.8× 314 0.4× 679 0.9× 90 2.1k
Koichi Takahashi Japan 26 739 0.4× 1.1k 0.9× 612 0.5× 527 0.6× 528 0.7× 103 2.1k
Erik T. Nilsen United States 32 1.1k 0.6× 950 0.8× 1.7k 1.5× 541 0.7× 332 0.4× 97 2.9k
Øystein Johnsen Norway 28 977 0.5× 1.0k 0.9× 1.6k 1.4× 381 0.5× 524 0.7× 62 3.0k
Brian D. Kloeppel United States 12 1.2k 0.7× 992 0.8× 601 0.5× 1.2k 1.5× 301 0.4× 12 2.6k
Jennifer A. Plaut United States 9 3.4k 1.8× 1.9k 1.6× 1.3k 1.1× 669 0.8× 1.8k 2.4× 9 4.2k
Rose‐Marie Muzika United States 26 779 0.4× 681 0.6× 550 0.5× 1.1k 1.3× 304 0.4× 69 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Anna W. Schoettle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna W. Schoettle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna W. Schoettle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna W. Schoettle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna W. Schoettle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna W. Schoettle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna W. Schoettle. The network helps show where Anna W. Schoettle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna W. Schoettle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna W. Schoettle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna W. Schoettle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna W. Schoettle. Anna W. Schoettle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Burns, Kelly S., et al.. (2023). Interactions between white pine blister rust, bark beetles, and climate over time indicate vulnerabilities to limber pine health. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. 6. 1 indexed citations
2.
Schoettle, Anna W., et al.. (2022). Restoring a forest keystone species: A plan for the restoration of whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis Engelm.) in the Crown of the Continent Ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management. 522. 120282–120282. 10 indexed citations
3.
Tomback, Diana F., Robert E. Keane, Anna W. Schoettle, et al.. (2022). Tamm review: Current and recommended management practices for the restoration of whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis Engelm.), an imperiled high-elevation Western North American forest tree. Forest Ecology and Management. 522. 119929–119929. 19 indexed citations
4.
Liu, Jun‐Jun, et al.. (2021). Fine dissection of limber pine resistance to Cronartium ribicola using targeted sequencing of the NLR family. BMC Genomics. 22(1). 567–567. 8 indexed citations
5.
6.
Meldrum, James R., Patricia A. Champ, Craig A. Bond, & Anna W. Schoettle. (2020). Paired Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Management of White Pine Blister Rust: Order Effects and Outcome Uncertainty. Journal of Forest Economics. 35(1). 75–101. 6 indexed citations
7.
8.
Menon, Mitra, Justin C. Bagley, Amy V. Whipple, et al.. (2018). The role of hybridization during ecological divergence of southwestern white pine ( Pinus strobiformis ) and limber pine ( P. flexilis ). Molecular Ecology. 27(5). 1245–1260. 43 indexed citations
9.
Schoettle, Anna W., et al.. (2016). Carbon Costs of Constitutive and Expressed Resistance to a Non-Native Pathogen in Limber Pine. PLoS ONE. 11(10). e0162913–e0162913. 6 indexed citations
10.
Schoettle, Anna W., et al.. (2011). Demographic projection of high‐elevation white pines infected with white pine blister rust: a nonlinear disease model. Ecological Applications. 22(1). 166–183. 21 indexed citations
11.
Coop, Jonathan D. & Anna W. Schoettle. (2011). Fire and high-elevation, five-needle pine (Pinus aristata & P. flexilis) ecosystems in the southern Rocky Mountains: What do we know?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 63(6). 164–173. 7 indexed citations
12.
Schoettle, Anna W. & Richard A. Sniezko. (2007). Proactive intervention to sustain high-elevation pine ecosystems threatened by white pine blister rust. Journal of Forest Research. 12(5). 327–336. 119 indexed citations
13.
Schoettle, Anna W. & José F. Negrón. (2001). First report of two cone and seed insects on Pinus flexilis.. Western North American Naturalist. 61(2). 252–254. 10 indexed citations
14.
Schoettle, Anna W., et al.. (2000). Morphological variation of Pinus flexilis (Pinaceae), a bird-dispersed pine, across a range of elevations.. PubMed. 87(12). 1797–806. 86 indexed citations
15.
Schoettle, Anna W. & William K. Smith. (1999). Interrelationships among light, photosynthesis and nitrogen in the crown of mature Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia. Tree Physiology. 19(1). 13–22. 71 indexed citations
16.
Yoder, Barbara J., Michael G. Ryan, Richard H. Waring, Anna W. Schoettle, & M. R. Kaufmann. (1994). Evidence of Reduced Photosynthetic Rates in Old Trees. Forest Science. 40(3). 513–527. 391 indexed citations
17.
Schoettle, Anna W.. (1994). Influence of tree size on shoot structure and physiology of Pinus contorta and Pinus aristata. Tree Physiology. 14(7-8-9). 1055–1068. 78 indexed citations
18.
Schoettle, Anna W. & William K. Smith. (1991). Interrelation between shoot characteristics and solar irradiance in the crown of Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia. Tree Physiology. 9(1-2). 245–254. 52 indexed citations
19.
Schoettle, Anna W.. (1990). The interaction between leaf longevity and shoot growth and foliar biomass per shoot inPinus contortaat two elevations. Tree Physiology. 7(1-2-3-4). 209–214. 68 indexed citations
20.
Reich, Peter B. & Anna W. Schoettle. (1988). Role of phosphorus and nitrogen in photosynthetic and whole plant carbon gain and nutrient use efficiency in eastern white pine. Oecologia. 77(1). 25–33. 126 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026