Anna Lose
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 7
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders 3
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 1
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 3
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 1
- Co-authors
- Ulrike Schmidt (7 shared papers)Janet Treasure (7 shared papers)Martha Kenyon (7 shared papers)Lorna Richards (6 shared papers)Nicky Boughton (6 shared papers)Lucy Serpell (6 shared papers)Eric Johnson‐Sabine (5 shared papers)Hannah Broadbent (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Eating Disorders (2 papers)European Eating Disorders Review (2 papers)Trials (1 paper)Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (1 paper)Journal of Eating Disorders (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Anna Lose
7 papers receiving 146 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Clinical Psychology 143
- Applied Psychology 16
- Pharmacy 14
- Psychiatry and Mental health 33
- Cognitive Neuroscience 26
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Lose
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Lose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Lose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Lose more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Lose
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Lose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Lose. The network helps show where Anna Lose may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Anna Lose, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 56 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 34 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 2 |
About Anna Lose
Anna Lose is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 7 papers that have together received 153 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (7 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (143 citations), Applied Psychology (16 citations), Pharmacy (14 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (33 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (26 citations). Anna Lose has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ulrike Schmidt, Janet Treasure, Martha Kenyon, Lorna Richards, Nicky Boughton, Lucy Serpell, Eric Johnson‐Sabine, Hannah Broadbent, Hannah DeJong and Charlotte Watson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Eating Disorders, European Eating Disorders Review, Trials, Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy and Journal of Eating Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.