Anna Lewis

1.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
34 papers, 798 citations indexed

About

Anna Lewis is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Lewis has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 798 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Genetics, 10 papers in Molecular Biology and 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Anna Lewis's work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (8 papers), Race, Genetics, and Society (5 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (4 papers). Anna Lewis is often cited by papers focused on BRCA gene mutations in cancer (8 papers), Race, Genetics, and Society (5 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (4 papers). Anna Lewis collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Anna Lewis's co-authors include Robert C. Green, Charlotte M. Deane, Nick S. Jones, Mason A. Porter, Jason L. Vassy, Charles V. Sanders, Bege Dauda, Peter Kraft, Benjamin M. Neale and Danielle S. Allen and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Physical Review Letters and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Anna Lewis

30 papers receiving 772 citations

Hit Papers

Getting genetic ancestry right for science and society 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 25 50 75 100

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna Lewis United States 16 316 238 77 70 42 34 798
Juping Zhang China 17 81 0.3× 224 0.9× 261 3.4× 83 1.2× 21 0.5× 73 1.3k
Guihua Li China 19 275 0.9× 196 0.8× 426 5.5× 65 0.9× 14 0.3× 54 1.1k
Naoto Sakamoto Japan 24 181 0.6× 311 1.3× 37 0.5× 164 2.3× 36 0.9× 135 2.5k
James A. Thomas United States 25 286 0.9× 712 3.0× 45 0.6× 303 4.3× 23 0.5× 58 2.2k
Andrés López‐Cortés Ecuador 22 152 0.5× 712 3.0× 123 1.6× 109 1.6× 30 0.7× 104 2.0k
Michael C. Jones United Kingdom 17 172 0.5× 107 0.4× 71 0.9× 186 2.7× 19 0.5× 45 938
Soyoung Kim South Korea 16 64 0.2× 160 0.7× 123 1.6× 97 1.4× 15 0.4× 51 765
Xiaolu Tang China 17 121 0.4× 496 2.1× 117 1.5× 136 1.9× 21 0.5× 36 1.9k
Laura Smith United Kingdom 22 144 0.5× 662 2.8× 50 0.6× 48 0.7× 25 0.6× 47 1.2k
Laura H. Goetz United States 13 137 0.4× 567 2.4× 197 2.6× 87 1.2× 44 1.0× 22 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Lewis. The network helps show where Anna Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Lewis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Lewis. Anna Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lewis, Anna, et al.. (2025). Multi-Value Alignment for Ml/Ai Development Choices. American Philosophical Quarterly. 62(2). 133–152.
2.
Shankar, Sripriya Nannu, et al.. (2024). 299 A CTS team approach to assess the in vitro toxicity of microplastic fibers to human lung epithelial cells cultured at an air-liquid interface. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science. 8(s1). 92–92.
3.
Rohani, Ali Haeri, Joel Hrit, Steven McFarlane, et al.. (2024). Single-genome analysis reveals a heterogeneous association of the herpes simplex virus genome with H3K27me2 and the reader PHF20L1 following infection of human fibroblasts. mBio. 15(4). e0327823–e0327823. 8 indexed citations
4.
Lewis, Anna, et al.. (2024). Compassionate Machines. JAMA Oncology. 10(7). 857–857. 1 indexed citations
5.
Dauda, Bege, Danielle S. Allen, Agustín Fuentes, et al.. (2023). Ancestry: How researchers use it and what they mean by it. Frontiers in Genetics. 14. 1044555–1044555. 11 indexed citations
6.
Vassy, Jason L., Charles A. Brunette, Matthew S. Lebo, et al.. (2023). The GenoVA study: Equitable implementation of a pragmatic randomized trial of polygenic-risk scoring in primary care. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 110(11). 1841–1852. 8 indexed citations
7.
Hayeck, Tristan J., George Busby, Sung Chun, et al.. (2023). Polygenic Risk Scores: Genomes to Risk Prediction. Clinical Chemistry. 69(6). 551–557.
8.
Lewis, Anna, Emma Perez, Anya E. R. Prince, et al.. (2022). Patient and provider perspectives on polygenic risk scores: implications for clinical reporting and utilization. Genome Medicine. 14(1). 114–114. 32 indexed citations
9.
Hao, Limin, Peter Kraft, Gabriel F. Berriz, et al.. (2022). Development of a clinical polygenic risk score assay and reporting workflow. Nature Medicine. 28(5). 1006–1013. 87 indexed citations
10.
Allen, Danielle S., et al.. (2022). A scoping review of guidelines for the use of race, ethnicity, and ancestry reveals widespread consensus but also points of ongoing disagreement. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 109(12). 2110–2125. 17 indexed citations
11.
Lewis, Anna, Paul S. Appelbaum, Bege Dauda, et al.. (2022). Getting genetic ancestry right for science and society. Science. 376(6590). 250–252. 105 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Rideout, Karen, Prabjit Barn, Anna Lewis, et al.. (2022). Public Health Messaging for Wildfire Smoke: Cast a Wide Net. Frontiers in Public Health. 10. 773428–773428. 15 indexed citations
13.
Lewis, Anna, Bartha Maria Knoppers, & Robert C. Green. (2021). An international policy on returning genomic research results. Genome Medicine. 13(1). 115–115. 21 indexed citations
14.
Lewis, Anna & Robert C. Green. (2021). Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: new perspectives needed on familiar ethical issues. Genome Medicine. 13(1). 14–14. 97 indexed citations
15.
Lewis, Anna, Robert C. Green, & Jason L. Vassy. (2021). Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: Translating risk into action. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(4). 100047–100047. 36 indexed citations
16.
Lewis, Anna, R. C. Green, & Anya E. R. Prince. (2020). Long-awaited progress in addressing genetic discrimination in the United States. Genetics in Medicine. 23(3). 429–431. 6 indexed citations
17.
Lewis, Anna, Nick S. Jones, Mason A. Porter, & Charlotte M. Deane. (2012). What Evidence Is There for the Homology of Protein-Protein Interactions?. PLoS Computational Biology. 8(9). e1002645–e1002645. 32 indexed citations
18.
Lewis, Anna, Nick S. Jones, Mason A. Porter, & Charlotte M. Deane. (2010). The function of communities in protein interaction networks at multiple scales. BMC Systems Biology. 4(1). 100–100. 61 indexed citations
19.
Lewis, Anna, et al.. (2009). Predicting protein–protein interactions in the context of protein evolution. Molecular BioSystems. 6(1). 55–64. 40 indexed citations
20.
Rabey, Jose M., Anna Lewis, E. Graff, & Amos D. Korczyn. (1992). Decreased (3H) quinuclidinyl benzilate binding to lymphocytes in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Biological Psychiatry. 31(9). 889–895. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026