Anna Kalynych

1.6k total citations
24 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Anna Kalynych is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Kalynych has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Surgery, 14 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 14 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Anna Kalynych's work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (19 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (14 papers) and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (6 papers). Anna Kalynych is often cited by papers focused on Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (19 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (14 papers) and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (6 papers). Anna Kalynych collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Anna Kalynych's co-authors include Dimitri Karmpaliotis, Harold Carlson, William Lombardi, Nicholas Lembo, David E. Kandzari, Emmanouil S. Brilakis, Ben Kirkland, Sarah Rinehart, Tesfaldet T. Michael and Subhash Banerjee and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and The American Journal of Cardiology.

In The Last Decade

Anna Kalynych

23 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna Kalynych United States 16 757 669 592 184 77 24 1.1k
Francesco Fracassi Italy 15 644 0.9× 799 1.2× 522 0.9× 174 0.9× 55 0.7× 72 1.2k
Claude Le Feuvre France 18 481 0.6× 619 0.9× 309 0.5× 162 0.9× 48 0.6× 85 1.1k
Mamoru Toyofuku Japan 17 411 0.5× 674 1.0× 242 0.4× 197 1.1× 47 0.6× 54 979
Mark Sanz United States 8 650 0.9× 691 1.0× 356 0.6× 168 0.9× 30 0.4× 15 949
Berrin Umman Türkiye 19 373 0.5× 798 1.2× 346 0.6× 104 0.6× 31 0.4× 71 1.1k
Giorgio Golia Italy 23 336 0.4× 1.6k 2.4× 482 0.8× 169 0.9× 88 1.1× 55 1.8k
Yoku Kikuchi Japan 16 264 0.3× 490 0.7× 399 0.7× 65 0.4× 54 0.7× 35 804
Vahid Nabavi United States 9 239 0.3× 386 0.6× 331 0.6× 84 0.5× 53 0.7× 15 682
Jun‐Hyok Oh South Korea 17 462 0.6× 454 0.7× 328 0.6× 121 0.7× 48 0.6× 67 731
Doralisa Morrone Italy 17 415 0.5× 618 0.9× 290 0.5× 91 0.5× 39 0.5× 50 992

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Kalynych

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Kalynych's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Kalynych with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Kalynych more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Kalynych

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Kalynych. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Kalynych. The network helps show where Anna Kalynych may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Kalynych

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Kalynych. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Kalynych based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Kalynych. Anna Kalynych is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kandzari, David E., Nicholas Lembo, Harold Carlson, et al.. (2019). Procedural, clinical, and health status outcomes in chronic total coronary occlusion revascularization: Results from the PERSPECTIVE study. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 96(3). 567–576. 4 indexed citations
2.
Bhatt, Kunal, et al.. (2014). Gastroepiploic Graft Dysfunction Caused by Celiac Artery Stenosis. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 7(10). e153–e155.
3.
Christopoulos, Georgios, Dimitri Karmpaliotis, Michael R. Wyman, et al.. (2014). Percutaneous Intervention of Circumflex Chronic Total Occlusions Is Associated With Worse Procedural Outcomes: Insights From a Multicentre US Registry. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 30(12). 1588–1594. 26 indexed citations
4.
Christopoulos, Georgios, Rohan Menon, Dimitri Karmpaliotis, et al.. (2014). Application of the “Hybrid Approach” to Chronic Total Occlusions in Patients With Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (from a Contemporary Multicenter US Registry). The American Journal of Cardiology. 113(12). 1990–1994. 48 indexed citations
5.
Michael, Tesfaldet T., Dimitri Karmpaliotis, Emmanouil S. Brilakis, et al.. (2013). Impact of prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery on chronic total occlusion revascularisation: insights from a multicentre US registry. Heart. 99(20). 1515–1518. 70 indexed citations
6.
Karmpaliotis, Dimitri, Nicholas Lembo, Anna Kalynych, et al.. (2013). Development of a high‐volume, multiple‐operator program for percutaneous chronic total coronary occlusion revascularization: procedural, clinical, and cost‐utilization outcomes. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 82(1). 1–8. 73 indexed citations
8.
Michael, Tesfaldet T., Dimitri Karmpaliotis, Emmanouil S. Brilakis, et al.. (2013). Procedural Outcomes of Revascularization of Chronic Total Occlusion of Native Coronary Arteries (from a Multicenter United States Registry). The American Journal of Cardiology. 112(4). 488–492. 79 indexed citations
11.
Karmpaliotis, Dimitri, Tesfaldet T. Michael, Emmanouil S. Brilakis, et al.. (2012). Retrograde Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 5(12). 1273–1279. 98 indexed citations
15.
Marso, Steven P., Todd D. Miller, Barry D. Rutherford, et al.. (2007). Comparison of Myocardial Reperfusion in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction With Versus Without Diabetes Mellitus (from the EMERALD Trial). The American Journal of Cardiology. 100(2). 206–210. 88 indexed citations
16.
Brodie, Bruce R., John G. Webb, David A. Cox, et al.. (2007). Impact of Time to Treatment on Myocardial Reperfusion and Infarct Size With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction (from the EMERALD Trial). The American Journal of Cardiology. 99(12). 1680–1686. 69 indexed citations
17.
Stone, Gregg W., John Webb, David A. Cox, et al.. (2004). 829-5 Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with distal protection of the microcirculation: Principal results from the prospective, randomized EMERALD trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 43(5). A285–A286. 14 indexed citations
18.
Mavromatis, Kreton, Ziyad M.B. Ghazzal, Emir Veledar, et al.. (2004). Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention of ostial versus nonostial narrowing of the major epicardial coronary arteries. The American Journal of Cardiology. 94(5). 583–587. 36 indexed citations
19.
Nunes, Gilberto L., Keith A. Robinson, Anna Kalynych, et al.. (1997). Vitamins C and E Inhibit O 2 Production in the Pig Coronary Artery. Circulation. 96(10). 3593–3601. 131 indexed citations
20.
Kalynych, Anna & Spencer B. King. (1995). PTCA versus CABG for angina pectoris. Coronary Artery Disease. 6(10). 788–796. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026