Anna Hofmann

889 citations
12 papers · 191 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 2
    • Neurological diseases and metabolism 1
    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 2
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 2

Anna Hofmann

11 papers receiving 180 citations

Peers

Anna Hofmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 75
  • Occupational Therapy 19
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 28
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 76
  • Sensory Systems 18
Replace Émilie Lacroix with:
Émilie Lacroix Belgium
Vannina Pieri Luxembourg
Ivan Lorenzo Mexico
Anna Bereś Poland
Ming‐Hui Yong Singapore
Daniel S. Kluger Germany
Amit Marmelshtein Israel
Esra Al Germany
Paweł Motyka Poland
Robert Fellinger Austria
Anna Hofmann relative to Émilie Lacroix Belgium Émilie Lacroix's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Émilie Lacroix · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Hofmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Hofmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Hofmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Hofmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Hofmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Hofmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Hofmann. The network helps show where Anna Hofmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Hofmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Hofmann Line = papers co-authored together Anna Hofmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2001131
2 199417
3 201512
4 20219
5 20226
6 20245
7 20234
8 20213
9 20192
10 20211
11 20251
12 20250

About Anna Hofmann

Anna Hofmann is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 191 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (2 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (2 papers) and Neurological diseases and metabolism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (75 citations), Occupational Therapy (19 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (28 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (76 citations) and Sensory Systems (18 citations). Anna Hofmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Wilhelm, Holger Lüdtke, Helmut Wilhelm, H. Giedke, Howard P. Parette, Alan VanBiervliet, Ann‐Christine Ehlis, Andreas J. Fallgatter, Tobias Peters and David Rosenbaum. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Human Biology, Acta Neuropathologica Communications, Brain Communications, Journal of Sleep Research and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact