Anna Geis

778 citations
31 papers · 211 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Geis

30 papers receiving 178 citations

Peers

Anna Geis
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Political Science and International Relations 150
  • Development 22
  • Sociology and Political Science 123
  • Philosophy 24
  • Communication 10
Replace Benjamin Herborth with:
Benjamin Herborth Netherlands
Condoleezza Rice United States
Martin Walker United States
Steve Coll
Robert Cooper United States
Bastian Giegerich United Kingdom
Brian C. Schmidt Canada
Philip Everts Netherlands
Brian Urquhart United States
Isao Miyaoka Japan
Anna Geis relative to Benjamin Herborth Netherlands Benjamin Herborth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Benjamin Herborth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Geis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Geis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Geis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Geis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Geis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Geis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Geis. The network helps show where Anna Geis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Geis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Geis Line = papers co-authored together Anna Geis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202026
2 201322
3 201021
4 201520
5 202015
6 202010
7 201010
8 20139
9
Schattenseiten des Demokratischen Friedens: Zur Kritik einer Theorie liberaler Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik
20078
10 20218
11 20058
12 20148
13 20016
14 20115
15 20075
16 20065
17
Die Zivilmacht Deutschland und die Enttabuisierung des Militärischen
20054
18 20183
19 20222
20 20042

About Anna Geis

Anna Geis is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Strategy and Management and Development, having authored 31 papers that have together received 211 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Peace and Security Dynamics (15 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (9 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (7 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (6 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (4 papers), Global Security and Public Health (3 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (2 papers) and International Development and Aid (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (150 citations), Development (22 citations), Sociology and Political Science (123 citations), Philosophy (24 citations) and Communication (10 citations). Anna Geis has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Louise Wiuff Moe, Wolfgang Wagner, Harald Müller, Christian Opitz, Christopher Daase, Caroline Fehl, Carmen Wunderlich, Christopher Hobson, Ursula Schröder and Lothar Brock. Their work appears in journals such as International Politics, Global Constitutionalism, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding and International Studies Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact