Anna Garrett Kusche
About
In The Last Decade
Anna Garrett Kusche
2 papers receiving 409 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Social Psychology 369
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 145
- Sociology and Political Science 144
- Clinical Psychology 132
- Applied Psychology 88
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Garrett Kusche
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Garrett Kusche's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Garrett Kusche with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Garrett Kusche more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Garrett Kusche
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Garrett Kusche. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Garrett Kusche. The network helps show where Anna Garrett Kusche may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Garrett Kusche
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Garrett Kusche. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Garrett Kusche based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Garrett Kusche. Anna Garrett Kusche is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 223 | |
| 2 | 212 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.