Anna E. Hogg

3.4k total citations
51 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Anna E. Hogg is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna E. Hogg has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Atmospheric Science, 28 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 12 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Anna E. Hogg's work include Cryospheric studies and observations (47 papers), Winter Sports Injuries and Performance (28 papers) and Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (27 papers). Anna E. Hogg is often cited by papers focused on Cryospheric studies and observations (47 papers), Winter Sports Injuries and Performance (28 papers) and Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (27 papers). Anna E. Hogg collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Anna E. Hogg's co-authors include Andrew Shepherd, Malcolm McMillan, Alan Muir, Lin Gilbert, Kate Briggs, Thomas Slater, Hannes Konrad, A. Sundal, G. Hilmar Gudmundsson and A. Ridout and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Geophysical Research Letters and Science Advances.

In The Last Decade

Anna E. Hogg

47 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna E. Hogg United Kingdom 23 1.5k 758 329 206 183 51 1.7k
Malcolm McMillan United Kingdom 21 1.6k 1.1× 775 1.0× 354 1.1× 168 0.8× 153 0.8× 56 1.8k
Luke D. Trusel United States 17 1.7k 1.2× 632 0.8× 259 0.8× 475 2.3× 189 1.0× 28 1.9k
Benjamin K. Galton‐Fenzi Australia 25 1.6k 1.1× 546 0.7× 212 0.6× 317 1.5× 215 1.2× 85 1.8k
Twila Moon United States 20 2.7k 1.8× 1.1k 1.5× 530 1.6× 141 0.7× 143 0.8× 38 2.8k
Alison F. Banwell United States 24 1.6k 1.1× 955 1.3× 430 1.3× 128 0.6× 57 0.3× 55 1.8k
J. A. Bohlander United States 13 2.4k 1.6× 1.3k 1.7× 660 2.0× 217 1.1× 124 0.7× 18 2.5k
S. Ligtenberg Netherlands 5 1.6k 1.1× 684 0.9× 251 0.8× 277 1.3× 188 1.0× 6 1.7k
David Burgess Canada 23 1.6k 1.1× 373 0.5× 271 0.8× 216 1.0× 117 0.6× 53 1.7k
Guðfinna Ađalgeirsdóttir Iceland 25 1.7k 1.1× 325 0.4× 374 1.1× 279 1.4× 134 0.7× 62 1.8k
B. R. Parizek United States 24 1.8k 1.2× 778 1.0× 534 1.6× 83 0.4× 68 0.4× 56 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Anna E. Hogg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna E. Hogg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna E. Hogg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna E. Hogg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna E. Hogg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna E. Hogg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna E. Hogg. The network helps show where Anna E. Hogg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna E. Hogg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna E. Hogg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna E. Hogg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna E. Hogg. Anna E. Hogg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Davison, Benjamin, Anna E. Hogg, Thomas Slater, Richard Rigby, & Nicolaj Hansen. (2025). Antarctic Ice Sheet grounding line discharge from 1996–2024. Earth system science data. 17(7). 3259–3281.
3.
Hogg, Anna E., Stephen Cornford, Benjamin Davison, et al.. (2024). The effect of landfast sea ice buttressing on ice dynamic speedup in the Larsen B embayment, Antarctica. ˜The œcryosphere. 18(3). 977–993. 7 indexed citations
4.
Hogg, Anna E., et al.. (2024). Change in grounding line location on the Antarctic Peninsula measured using a tidal motion offset correlation method. ˜The œcryosphere. 18(10). 4723–4742. 4 indexed citations
5.
Marsh, Oliver J., H. A. Fricker, Anna E. Hogg, et al.. (2024). Coincident Lake Drainage and Grounding Line Retreat at Engelhardt Subglacial Lake, West Antarctica. Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface. 129(9). 5 indexed citations
6.
Davison, Benjamin, Anna E. Hogg, Richard Rigby, et al.. (2023). Sea level rise from West Antarctic mass loss significantly modified by large snowfall anomalies. Nature Communications. 14(1). 1479–1479. 36 indexed citations
7.
Hogg, Anna E., et al.. (2023). Episodic dynamic change linked to damage on the Thwaites Glacier Ice Tongue. Nature Geoscience. 16(1). 37–43. 25 indexed citations
8.
Hogg, Anna E., et al.. (2023). Change in Antarctic ice shelf area from 2009 to 2019. ˜The œcryosphere. 17(5). 2059–2072. 19 indexed citations
9.
Davison, Benjamin, Anna E. Hogg, Noël Gourmelen, et al.. (2023). Annual mass budget of Antarctic ice shelves from 1997 to 2021. Science Advances. 9(41). eadi0186–eadi0186. 27 indexed citations
10.
Hogg, Anna E., et al.. (2023). Mapping Antarctic crevasses and their evolution with deep learning applied to satellite radar imagery. ˜The œcryosphere. 17(10). 4421–4445. 9 indexed citations
11.
Killick, Rebecca, Amber Leeson, Christopher Nemeth, et al.. (2023). Characterising the ice sheet surface in Northeast Greenland using Sentinel-1 SAR data. Journal of Glaciology. 69(278). 1834–1845. 2 indexed citations
12.
Hogg, Anna E., et al.. (2023). Widespread seasonal speed-up of west Antarctic Peninsula glaciers from 2014 to 2021. Nature Geoscience. 16(3). 231–237. 29 indexed citations
13.
Meredith, Michael P., Mark Inall, J. Alexander Brearley, et al.. (2022). Internal tsunamigenesis and ocean mixing driven by glacier calving in Antarctica. Science Advances. 8(47). eadd0720–eadd0720. 11 indexed citations
14.
Hogg, Anna E., Stephen Cornford, Pierre Dutrieux, et al.. (2021). Widespread increase in dynamic imbalance in the Getz region of Antarctica from 1994 to 2018. Nature Communications. 12(1). 1133–1133. 26 indexed citations
15.
Raj, Roshin P., Ole Andersen, Johnny A. Johannessen, et al.. (2020). Arctic Sea Level Budget Assessment during the GRACE/Argo Time Period. Remote Sensing. 12(17). 2837–2837. 14 indexed citations
16.
Shepherd, Andrew, Lin Gilbert, Alan Muir, et al.. (2019). Trends in Antarctic Ice Sheet Elevation and Mass. Geophysical Research Letters. 46(14). 8174–8183. 139 indexed citations
17.
Bingham, Robert G., Edward C. King, Andrew M. Smith, et al.. (2018). How dynamic are ice-stream beds?. ˜The œcryosphere. 12(5). 1615–1628. 11 indexed citations
18.
Shepherd, Andrew, et al.. (2018). Ice velocity of Jakobshavn Isbræ, Petermann Glacier, Nioghalvfjerdsfjorden, and Zachariæ Isstrøm, 2015–2017, from Sentinel 1-a/b SAR imagery. ˜The œcryosphere. 12(6). 2087–2097. 61 indexed citations
19.
Slater, Thomas, Andrew Shepherd, Malcolm McMillan, et al.. (2018). A new digital elevation model of Antarctica derived from CryoSat-2 altimetry. ˜The œcryosphere. 12(4). 1551–1562. 57 indexed citations
20.
Konrad, Hannes, Lin Gilbert, Stephen Cornford, et al.. (2016). Uneven onset and pace of ice‐dynamical imbalance in the Amundsen Sea Embayment, West Antarctica. Geophysical Research Letters. 44(2). 910–918. 65 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026