Anna Brooks

637 total citations
29 papers, 373 citations indexed

About

Anna Brooks is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Brooks has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 373 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Social Psychology, 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 9 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Anna Brooks's work include Action Observation and Synchronization (9 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers). Anna Brooks is often cited by papers focused on Action Observation and Synchronization (9 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers). Anna Brooks collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and Canada. Anna Brooks's co-authors include Rick van der Zwan, Nikolaus F. Troje, Olaf Blanke, Karl Verfaillie, Ben Schouten, Martin Vetterli, Aude Billard, Stéphanie Clarke, Pär Halje and Christof Faller and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Neuropsychologia and Experimental Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

Anna Brooks

26 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna Brooks Australia	12	198	171	130	76	42	29	373
Daniel Randles Canada	5	184 0.9×	246 1.4×	152 1.2×	70 0.9×	77 1.8×	5	465
Stéphanie Barbu France	16	190 1.0×	233 1.4×	103 0.8×	49 0.6×	26 0.6×	30	604
László Bernáth Hungary	10	138 0.7×	69 0.4×	202 1.6×	59 0.8×	88 2.1×	26	355
Avi Gilboa Israel	14	247 1.2×	319 1.9×	63 0.5×	76 1.0×	66 1.6×	52	505
Patricia A. Self United States	10	163 0.8×	105 0.6×	109 0.8×	103 1.4×	40 1.0×	19	478
Curtis Samuels Australia	11	232 1.2×	115 0.7×	311 2.4×	115 1.5×	52 1.2×	19	514
Eloise Stark United Kingdom	7	251 1.3×	153 0.9×	141 1.1×	189 2.5×	39 0.9×	16	523
Yasuhiro Kanakogi Japan	14	292 1.5×	453 2.6×	93 0.7×	41 0.5×	90 2.1×	46	713
Kristofor McCarty United Kingdom	16	158 0.8×	96 0.6×	236 1.8×	259 3.4×	40 1.0×	40	603
Jeanne L. Shinskey United States	13	190 1.0×	141 0.8×	67 0.5×	28 0.4×	56 1.3×	22	564

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Brooks

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Brooks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Brooks

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Brooks. The network helps show where Anna Brooks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Brooks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Brooks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Brooks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Brooks. Anna Brooks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Pearce, Tania, Myfanwy Maple, Sarah Wayland, et al.. (2022). A mixed-methods systematic review of suicide prevention interventions involving multisectoral collaborations. Health Research Policy and Systems. 20(1). 40–40. 20 indexed citations

Waling, Andrea, et al.. (2021). Trans and Gender‐Diverse peoples’ experiences of crisis helpline services. Health & Social Care in the Community. 29(3). 672–684. 19 indexed citations

Waling, Andrea, et al.. (2021). The experiences of lesbian, gay and bisexual people accessing mental health crisis support helplines in Australia. Psychology and Sexuality. 13(5). 1150–1167. 12 indexed citations

Faivre, Nathan, Anna Brooks, Wenwen Chang, et al.. (2020). Somatosensory-visual effects in visual biological motion perception. PLoS ONE. 15(6). e0234026–e0234026.

Boyd, William, et al.. (2017). Right to leisure? Refocusing on the dolphin. Annals of Leisure Research. 20(3). 368–385. 8 indexed citations

Zwan, Rick van der, et al.. (2016). Converging Evidence of Ubiquitous Male Bias in Human Sex Perception. PLoS ONE. 11(2). e0148623–e0148623. 9 indexed citations

Zwan, Rick van der, et al.. (2014). Hands as Sex Cues: Sensitivity Measures, Male Bias Measures, and Implications for Sex Perception Mechanisms. PLoS ONE. 9(3). e91032–e91032. 12 indexed citations

Brooks, Anna, et al.. (2013). Sex discriminations made on the basis of ambiguous visual cues can be affected by the presence of an olfactory cue. BMC Psychology. 1(1). 10–10. 4 indexed citations

Zwan, Rick van der, et al.. (2012). Eye of the Beholder: Symmetry Perception in Social Judgments Based on Whole Body Displays. i-Perception. 3(7). 398–409. 1 indexed citations

10.

Zwan, Rick van der, et al.. (2012). Perceiving other people on the basis of categorical multisensory data: towards a unified theory of person perception. ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University). 1. 105–115. 1 indexed citations

11.

Zwan, Rick van der, et al.. (2012). The 1-2-3 Magic Program:Implementation Outcomes of an Australian Pilot Evaluation With School-Aged Children. Child & Family Behavior Therapy. 34(1). 53–69. 9 indexed citations

12.

Brooks, Anna, et al.. (2010). Humans are handy at sex discrimination: A new tool for discriminating vision-based sensitivity to another's sex. Perception. 39. 90–90. 1 indexed citations

13.

Schouten, Ben, Nikolaus F. Troje, Anna Brooks, Rick van der Zwan, & Karl Verfaillie. (2010). The facing bias in biological motion perception: Effects of stimulus gender and observer sex. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 72(5). 1256–1260. 54 indexed citations

14.

Brooks, Anna, et al.. (2010). Feeling in control of your footsteps: Conscious gait monitoring and the auditory consequences of footsteps. Cognitive Neuroscience. 1(3). 184–192. 47 indexed citations

15.

Zwan, Rick van der, et al.. (2009). Gender bending: auditory cues affect visual judgements of gender in biological motion displays. Experimental Brain Research. 198(2-3). 373–382. 31 indexed citations

16.

Brooks, Anna, et al.. (2007). Local and global cues are incorporated into perceptions of biological motion. ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University).

17.

Brooks, Anna, et al.. (2006). Auditory motion affects visual biological motion processing. Neuropsychologia. 45(3). 523–530. 45 indexed citations

18.

Blanke, Olaf, Anna Brooks, Manuel Mercier, et al.. (2006). Distinct mechanisms of form-from-motion perception in human extrastriate cortex. Neuropsychologia. 45(4). 644–653. 15 indexed citations

19.

Brooks, Anna, Rick van der Zwan, & John G. Holden. (2003). An illusion of coherent global motion arising from single brief presentations of a stationary stimulus. Vision Research. 43(23). 2387–2392. 6 indexed citations

20.

Brooks, Anna, Amanda LeCouteur, & Julie Hepworth. (1998). Accounts of experiences of bulimia: A discourse analytic study. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 24(2). 193–205. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact