Ann Ruth Willner
Impact in
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Management and Organizational Studies
- Management Theory and Practice
Papers in
-
- Asian Studies and History 4
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies 2
- Islamic Studies and Radicalism 1
-
- Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies 1
- Co-authors
- John C. Campbell (1 shared paper)Dorothy Willner (1 shared paper)Ira J. Cohen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- World Politics (2 papers)Human Organization (1 paper)Foreign Affairs (1 paper)Economic Development and Cultural Change (1 paper)The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Ann Ruth Willner
10 papers receiving 352 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 138
- General Psychology 6
- Communication 33
- Social Psychology 90
- Political Science and International Relations 106
Countries citing papers authored by Ann Ruth Willner
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Ruth Willner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Ruth Willner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Ruth Willner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Ruth Willner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Ruth Willner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Ruth Willner. The network helps show where Ann Ruth Willner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Ann Ruth Willner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 177 | |
| 2 | 1984 | 139 | |
| 3 | 1965 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 23 | |
| 5 | 1964 | 14 | |
| 6 | The neotraditional accommodation to political independence : the case of Indonesia | 1966 | 10 |
| 7 | 1985 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1970 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1963 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1967 | 2 | |
| 11 | Public protest in Indonesia | 1968 | 1 |
| 12 | 1958 | 0 |
About Ann Ruth Willner
Ann Ruth Willner is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Studies and History (4 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper) and Islamic Studies and Radicalism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (138 citations), General Psychology (6 citations), Communication (33 citations), Social Psychology (90 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (106 citations). Ann Ruth Willner has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include John C. Campbell, Dorothy Willner and Ira J. Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as World Politics, Human Organization, Foreign Affairs, Economic Development and Cultural Change and The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.