Ann Lin

922 citations
26 papers · 591 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Ann Lin

26 papers receiving 582 citations

Peers

Ann Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 103
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 92
  • Rehabilitation 99
  • Emergency Medicine 88
  • Clinical Psychology 187
Replace Paula Popok with:
Paula Popok United States
Claudia Gamel Netherlands
Tove Lindhardt Denmark
Patrocinio Ariza‐Vega Spain
Tara Tehan United States
Megan M. Hosey United States
Den‐Ching A. Lee Australia
Cynthia L. Port United States
Carol O. Long United States
Alaa Oteir Jordan
Ann Lin relative to Paula Popok United States Paula Popok's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Paula Popok · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Lin. The network helps show where Ann Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ann Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201891
2 202072
3 201558
4 202047
5 201947
6 201946
7 202034
8 201434
9 201829
10 201924
11 201922
12 202022
13 201413
14 201912
15 200212
16 20208
17 20215
18 20203
19 20232
20 20232

About Ann Lin

Ann Lin is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pharmacology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (6 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (103 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (92 citations), Rehabilitation (99 citations), Emergency Medicine (88 citations) and Clinical Psychology (187 citations). Ann Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Ana‐Maria Vranceanu, Jonathan Rosand, Melissa Gates, Eric A. Macklin, Emily L. Zale, Emma Meyers, Jessica L. McCurley, Jeffrey S. Upperman, Ethan G. Lester and Tara Tehan. Their work appears in journals such as Neurocritical Care, JAMA Network Open, Sports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach, Psychosomatics and Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact