Ann Lin

922 total citations
26 papers, 591 citations indexed

About

Ann Lin is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ann Lin has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 591 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Clinical Psychology, 7 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 6 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Ann Lin's work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers) and Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (6 papers). Ann Lin is often cited by papers focused on Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers) and Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (6 papers). Ann Lin collaborates with scholars based in United States, Austria and China. Ann Lin's co-authors include Ana‐Maria Vranceanu, Jonathan Rosand, Eric A. Macklin, Melissa Gates, Emily L. Zale, Jessica L. McCurley, Emma Meyers, Jeffrey S. Upperman, Ethan G. Lester and Tara Tehan and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and JAMA Network Open.

In The Last Decade

Ann Lin

26 papers receiving 582 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ann Lin United States 13 187 135 124 104 103 26 591
Paula Popok United States 13 160 0.9× 34 0.3× 140 1.1× 86 0.8× 49 0.5× 29 429
Tara Tehan United States 11 191 1.0× 52 0.4× 60 0.5× 13 0.1× 121 1.2× 16 448
Claudia Gamel Netherlands 15 140 0.7× 41 0.3× 133 1.1× 20 0.2× 150 1.5× 24 747
Den‐Ching A. Lee Australia 16 122 0.7× 47 0.3× 256 2.1× 98 0.9× 22 0.2× 52 708
Khader A. Almhdawi Jordan 15 138 0.7× 44 0.3× 94 0.8× 173 1.7× 8 0.1× 42 551
Patrocinio Ariza‐Vega Spain 14 37 0.2× 117 0.9× 119 1.0× 36 0.3× 16 0.2× 40 733
Susan Baptiste Canada 9 77 0.4× 46 0.3× 172 1.4× 67 0.6× 23 0.2× 13 478
Michael L. Foreman United States 17 197 1.1× 110 0.8× 28 0.2× 72 0.7× 74 0.7× 46 706
Oskar Mittag Germany 19 109 0.6× 98 0.7× 91 0.7× 112 1.1× 10 0.1× 78 955
Kyler M. Godwin United States 14 112 0.6× 229 1.7× 325 2.6× 31 0.3× 12 0.1× 47 860

Countries citing papers authored by Ann Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Lin. The network helps show where Ann Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann Lin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann Lin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann Lin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann Lin. Ann Lin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
3.
Greenberg, Jonathan, Ann Lin, Paula Popok, et al.. (2021). Getting Active Mindfully: Rationale and Case Illustration of a Group Mind-body and Activity Program for Chronic Pain. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. 28(4). 706–719. 5 indexed citations
4.
Kim, Angela, et al.. (2021). New Bullous Eruptions in a COVID-19 Positive Patient in an Intensive Care Unit. SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine. 5(3). 278–282. 1 indexed citations
5.
Greenberg, Jonathan, Paula Popok, Ann Lin, et al.. (2020). A Mind-Body Physical Activity Program for Chronic Pain With or Without a Digital Monitoring Device: Proof-of-Concept Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Formative Research. 4(6). e18703–e18703. 47 indexed citations
6.
Morrill, Melinda Ippolito, Ryan A. Mace, Jonathan Greenberg, et al.. (2020). An Exploratory Analysis of Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity and Emotional Functioning in Patients With Chronic Pain. Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. 62(2). 234–242. 3 indexed citations
8.
Bannon, Sarah, Ethan G. Lester, Melissa Gates, et al.. (2020). Recovering together: building resiliency in dyads of stroke patients and their caregivers at risk for chronic emotional distress; a feasibility study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 6(1). 75–75. 34 indexed citations
9.
Lester, Ethan G., et al.. (2020). Associations Between Gender, Resiliency Factors, and Anxiety in Neuro-ICU Caregivers: a Prospective Study. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 27(6). 677–686. 8 indexed citations
11.
Meyers, Emma, Ann Lin, Ethan G. Lester, et al.. (2019). Baseline resilience and depression symptoms predict trajectory of depression in dyads of patients and their informal caregivers following discharge from the Neuro-ICU. General Hospital Psychiatry. 62. 87–92. 22 indexed citations
12.
Meyers, Emma, Kelly M. Shaffer, Melissa Gates, et al.. (2019). Baseline Resilience and Posttraumatic Symptoms in Dyads of Neurocritical Patients and Their Informal Caregivers: A Prospective Dyadic Analysis. Psychosomatics. 61(2). 135–144. 24 indexed citations
13.
Greenberg, Jonathan, Ann Lin, Emily L. Zale, et al.. (2019). <p>Development And Early Feasibility Testing Of A Mind-Body Physical Activity Program For Patients With Heterogeneous Chronic Pain; The GetActive Study</p>. Journal of Pain Research. Volume 12. 3279–3297. 47 indexed citations
14.
Vranceanu, Ana‐Maria, Cale A. Jacobs, Ann Lin, et al.. (2019). Results of a feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the Toolkit for Optimal Recovery (TOR): a live video program to prevent chronic pain in at-risk adults with orthopedic injuries. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 5(1). 30–30. 46 indexed citations
15.
Vranceanu, Ana‐Maria, Emily L. Zale, Eric A. Macklin, et al.. (2018). Mind-Body Treatment for International English-Speaking Adults With Neurofibromatosis via Live Videoconferencing: Protocol for a Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols. 7(10). e11008–e11008. 29 indexed citations
16.
McCurley, Jessica L., Christopher J. Funes, Emily L. Zale, et al.. (2018). Preventing Chronic Emotional Distress in Stroke Survivors and Their Informal Caregivers. Neurocritical Care. 30(3). 581–589. 91 indexed citations
17.
Burke, Rita V., et al.. (2014). A Mixed-methods Pilot Study of Disaster Preparedness and Resiliency Among Faith-based Organizations. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 29(2). 127–133. 13 indexed citations
18.
Lin, Ann, et al.. (2013). Pediatric Surge Pocket Guide: Review of an easily accessible tool for managing an influx of pediatric patients. American Journal of Disaster Medicine. 8(1). 75–82. 2 indexed citations
19.
Goodhue, Catherine J., et al.. (2013). Consider the children. Nursing Management. 44(11). 44–51. 1 indexed citations
20.
E.Sullivan, Larry & Ann Lin. (2002). Reform in the Making: The Implementation of Social Policy in Prison. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 31(2). 215–215. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026