Ann Dixon

599 total citations
7 papers, 433 citations indexed

About

Ann Dixon is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ann Dixon has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 433 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 2 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Ann Dixon's work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (3 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers). Ann Dixon is often cited by papers focused on Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (3 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers). Ann Dixon collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and Canada. Ann Dixon's co-authors include Sian K. Smith, Kirsten McCaffery, Lyndal Trevena, Don Nutbeam, Judy M. Simpson, Jesse Jansen, Andrew Hayen, Alexandra Barratt, Haryana M. Dhillon and Georgia Halkett and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Patient Education and Counseling and Medical Decision Making.

In The Last Decade

Ann Dixon

7 papers receiving 417 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ann Dixon Australia 7 275 81 64 44 39 7 433
Natalie A. Rivadeneira United States 13 226 0.8× 100 1.2× 72 1.1× 61 1.4× 62 1.6× 26 454
Manon Lemonde Canada 9 164 0.6× 96 1.2× 50 0.8× 33 0.8× 27 0.7× 46 344
Alison K. Herrmann United States 9 337 1.2× 80 1.0× 81 1.3× 30 0.7× 40 1.0× 19 543
Chiara Libreri Italy 5 289 1.1× 82 1.0× 33 0.5× 31 0.7× 41 1.1× 7 483
Margaret S. Pichardo United States 8 102 0.4× 94 1.2× 60 0.9× 42 1.0× 65 1.7× 36 379
Elaine M. Drew United States 9 171 0.6× 136 1.7× 54 0.8× 55 1.3× 37 0.9× 14 441
Karen E. Schifferdecker United States 13 263 1.0× 239 3.0× 80 1.3× 30 0.7× 24 0.6× 50 624
John‐Arne Skolbekken Norway 12 198 0.7× 169 2.1× 63 1.0× 84 1.9× 33 0.8× 33 565
Angela Falisi United States 9 203 0.7× 87 1.1× 61 1.0× 55 1.3× 84 2.2× 11 357
Jean O Taylor United States 11 284 1.0× 96 1.2× 89 1.4× 112 2.5× 76 1.9× 21 506

Countries citing papers authored by Ann Dixon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Dixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Dixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Dixon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Dixon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Dixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Dixon. The network helps show where Ann Dixon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann Dixon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann Dixon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann Dixon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann Dixon. Ann Dixon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Vardy, Janette L., Gregory R. Pond, Melanie L. Bell, et al.. (2022). A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 17(6). 1583–1595. 9 indexed citations
2.
Nickel, Brooke, Kirsten McCaffery, Nehmat Houssami, et al.. (2020). Views of healthcare professionals about the role of active monitoring in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Qualitative interview study. The Breast. 54. 99–105. 8 indexed citations
3.
Martin, Andrew, Haryana M. Dhillon, Janette L. Vardy, et al.. (2019). Neurocognitive Function and Quality of Life Outcomes in the ONTRAC Study for Skin Cancer Chemoprevention by Nicotinamide. Geriatrics. 4(1). 31–31. 6 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Sian K., Jennifer Taylor, Ann Dixon, et al.. (2017). Patients' experience of decision-making and receiving information during radiation therapy: A qualitative study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 30. 97–106. 26 indexed citations
5.
McCaffery, Kirsten, Ann Dixon, Andrew Hayen, et al.. (2011). The Influence of Graphic Display Format on the Interpretations of Quantitative Risk Information among Adults with Lower Education and Literacy. Medical Decision Making. 32(4). 532–544. 84 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Sian K., Lyndal Trevena, Alexandra Barratt, et al.. (2009). Development and preliminary evaluation of a bowel cancer screening decision aid for adults with lower literacy. Patient Education and Counseling. 75(3). 358–367. 32 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Sian K., Ann Dixon, Lyndal Trevena, Don Nutbeam, & Kirsten McCaffery. (2009). Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups. Social Science & Medicine. 69(12). 1805–1812. 268 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026