Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
GATEWAY™ vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Depicker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Depicker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Depicker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Depicker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Depicker. The network helps show where Ann Depicker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann Depicker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann Depicker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann Depicker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ann Depicker. Ann Depicker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Windels, Pieter, et al.. (1999). Development of a line specific GMO detection method: a case study.. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 459–462.2 indexed citations
11.
Wilde, Chris De, Koen Peeters, Marc Van Montagu, & Ann Depicker. (1998). Transient expression of IgG antibodies and antibody fragments in intact leaf tissue of Nicotiana tabacum. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
12.
Roldán-Ruíz, Isabel, Jan De Riek, E. Calsyn, et al.. (1997). The use of molecular markers for assessing genetic conformity between varieties of ryegrass. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 62. 1451–1457.1 indexed citations
13.
Depicker, Ann, Ivan Ingelbrecht, Helena Van Houdt, Marc De Loose, & Marc Van Montagu. (1996). Posttranscriptional reporter transgene silencing in transgenic tobacco. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).13 indexed citations
Depicker, Ann, et al.. (1982). Nopaline synthase: transcript mapping and DNA sequence [Agrobacterium tumefaciens].3 indexed citations
17.
Montagu, M. Van, Patricia Zambryski, Jean-Pierre Hernálsteens, et al.. (1980). The interaction of Agrobacterium Ti-plasmid DNA and plant cells. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. 210(1180). 351–365.15 indexed citations
18.
Wilde, Michel De, Ann Depicker, Guido De Vos, et al.. (1978). Molecular cloning as a tool to the analysis of the Ti plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).5 indexed citations
19.
Depicker, Ann, et al.. (1978). Molecular cloning as a tool to the analysis of the Ti plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens [proceedings].. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 129 B(4). 531–2.1 indexed citations
20.
Depicker, Ann, Marc Van Montagu, & Jeff Schell. (1977). Physical map of RP4. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.