Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Biological degradation of pharmaceuticals in municipal wastewater treatment: Proposing a classification scheme
2006907 citationsAdriano Joss, S. Żabczyński et al.Water Researchprofile →
Oxidation of Pharmaceuticals during Ozonation of Municipal Wastewater Effluents: A Pilot Study
This map shows the geographic impact of Anke Göbel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anke Göbel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anke Göbel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anke Göbel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anke Göbel. The network helps show where Anke Göbel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anke Göbel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anke Göbel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anke Göbel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anke Göbel. Anke Göbel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Joss, Adriano, S. Żabczyński, Anke Göbel, et al.. (2006). Biological degradation of pharmaceuticals in municipal wastewater treatment: Proposing a classification scheme. Water Research. 40(8). 1686–1696.907 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Göbel, Anke, et al.. (2006). Fate of sulfonamides, macrolides, and trimethoprim in different wastewater treatment technologies. The Science of The Total Environment. 372(2-3). 361–371.634 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Göbel, Anke, Adriano Joss, Dirk Löffler, et al.. (2005). Oxidation of Pharmaceuticals during Ozonation of Municipal Wastewater Effluents: A Pilot Study. Environmental Science & Technology. 39(11). 4290–4299.681 indexed citations breakdown →
Joss, Adriano, Elvira Keller, Alfredo C. Alder, et al.. (2005). Removal of pharmaceuticals and fragrances in biological wastewater treatment. Water Research. 39(14). 3139–3152.679 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Göbel, Anke, et al.. (2005). Occurrence and Sorption Behavior of Sulfonamides, Macrolides, and Trimethoprim in Activated Sludge Treatment. Environmental Science & Technology. 39(11). 3981–3989.617 indexed citations breakdown →
Siegrist, Hansruedi, Adriano Joss, Alfredo C. Alder, et al.. (2003). Micropollutants - new challenge in wastewater disposal?. DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)). 57. 7–10.10 indexed citations
9.
Siegrist, Hansruedi, Adriano Joss, Alfredo C. Alder, et al.. (2003). Mikroverunreinigungen - Abwasserentsorgung vor neuen Anforderungen?. DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)). 7–10.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.