Anjali Shah

1.4k total citations
46 papers, 990 citations indexed

About

Anjali Shah is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Anjali Shah has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 990 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Surgery, 12 papers in Oncology and 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Anjali Shah's work include Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (9 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (7 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (6 papers). Anjali Shah is often cited by papers focused on Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (9 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (7 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (6 papers). Anjali Shah collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Anjali Shah's co-authors include Bernard Rachet, Michel P. Coleman, Paul C. Lambert, Therése Andersson, Magnus Björkholm, Sarah Walters, Libby Ellis, Manuela Quaresma, Ula Nur and Laura M. Woods and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Lancet Oncology and European Heart Journal.

In The Last Decade

Anjali Shah

42 papers receiving 961 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anjali Shah United Kingdom 17 331 238 173 167 156 46 990
Maria Theresa Redaniel United Kingdom 19 387 1.2× 81 0.3× 170 1.0× 194 1.2× 94 0.6× 66 941
Michel van Agthoven Netherlands 18 265 0.8× 202 0.8× 148 0.9× 127 0.8× 78 0.5× 59 1.0k
Cristina Sarasqueta Spain 21 342 1.0× 473 2.0× 86 0.5× 120 0.7× 103 0.7× 70 1.4k
Francesco Cottone Italy 19 334 1.0× 185 0.8× 303 1.8× 215 1.3× 51 0.3× 60 1.1k
Hiroto Narimatsu Japan 21 342 1.0× 149 0.6× 466 2.7× 234 1.4× 170 1.1× 87 1.4k
Shelley Potter United Kingdom 21 326 1.0× 744 3.1× 198 1.1× 269 1.6× 66 0.4× 116 1.7k
Roger J. Black United Kingdom 17 333 1.0× 234 1.0× 84 0.5× 106 0.6× 103 0.7× 31 1.1k
Sabrina Trippoli Italy 17 213 0.6× 118 0.5× 149 0.9× 65 0.4× 85 0.5× 99 932
L Balducci United States 7 590 1.8× 140 0.6× 116 0.7× 180 1.1× 132 0.8× 10 1.2k
Kurt Hansen United States 7 760 2.3× 206 0.9× 105 0.6× 297 1.8× 70 0.4× 9 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Anjali Shah

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anjali Shah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anjali Shah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anjali Shah more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anjali Shah

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anjali Shah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anjali Shah. The network helps show where Anjali Shah may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anjali Shah

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anjali Shah. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anjali Shah based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anjali Shah. Anjali Shah is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Javaid, M K, Rafael Pinedo‐Villanueva, Anjali Shah, et al.. (2023). The Capture the Fracture® Partnership: an overview of a global initiative to increase the secondary fracture prevention care for patient benefit. Osteoporosis International. 34(11). 1827–1835. 7 indexed citations
3.
Shah, Anjali, Andrew Judge, & Xavier L Griffin. (2022). Incidence and quality of care for open fractures in England between 2008 and 2019. The Bone & Joint Journal. 104-B(6). 736–746. 16 indexed citations
4.
Shah, Anjali, Samuel Hawley, Dominic Inman, et al.. (2021). Geographical variation in surgical care and mortality following hip fracture in England: a cohort study using the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). Osteoporosis International. 32(10). 1989–1998. 5 indexed citations
6.
Shah, Anjali, Andrew Judge, Antonella Delmestri, et al.. (2017). Incidence of shoulder dislocations in the UK, 1995–2015: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 7(11). e016112–e016112. 73 indexed citations
7.
Chu, Thomas P. C., Anjali Shah, David Walker, & Michel P. Coleman. (2016). Where are the opportunities for an earlier diagnosis of primary intracranial tumours in children and young adults?. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology. 21(2). 388–395. 11 indexed citations
8.
Shah, Anjali, Daniel Prieto‐Alhambra, Samuel Hawley, et al.. (2016). Geographic variation in secondary fracture prevention after a hip fracture during 1999–2013: a UK study. Osteoporosis International. 28(1). 169–178. 25 indexed citations
9.
Knight, Marian, Colleen Acosta, Peter Brocklehurst, et al.. (2016). Beyond maternal death: improving the quality of maternal care through national studies of ‘near-miss’ maternal morbidity. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(9). 1–180. 30 indexed citations
10.
Shah, Anjali, et al.. (2015). Incident reviews in UK maternity units: a systematic appraisal of the quality of local guidelines. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 15(1). 58–58. 3 indexed citations
11.
Shack, Lorraine, Anjali Shah, Paul C. Lambert, & Bernard Rachet. (2012). Cure by age and stage at diagnosis for colorectal cancer patients in North West England, 1997–2004: A population-based study. Cancer Epidemiology. 36(6). 548–553. 16 indexed citations
12.
Shah, Anjali, et al.. (2011). Place of death and hospital care for children who died of cancer in England, 1999–2006. European Journal of Cancer. 47(14). 2175–2181. 27 indexed citations
13.
Ellis, Libby, Bernard Rachet, Anjali Shah, et al.. (2009). Trends in cancer survival in Spearhead Primary Care Trusts in England,1998–2004. PubMed. 41(1). 7–12. 10 indexed citations
14.
Shah, Anjali. (2009). Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. 20(2). 363–372. 37 indexed citations
15.
Rachet, Bernard, Camille Maringe, Ula Nur, et al.. (2009). Population-based cancer survival trends in England and Wales up to 2007: an assessment of the NHS cancer plan for England. The Lancet Oncology. 10(4). 351–369. 145 indexed citations
16.
Rachet, Bernard, Emmanuel Mitry, Anjali Shah, Nicola Cooper, & Michel P. Coleman. (2008). Survival from non-Hodgkin lymphoma in England and Wales up to 2001. British Journal of Cancer. 99(S1). S104–S106. 11 indexed citations
17.
Shah, Anjali, et al.. (2008). Survival from bladder cancer in England and Wales up to 2001. British Journal of Cancer. 99(S1). S86–S89. 32 indexed citations
18.
Rachet, Bernard, Emmanuel Mitry, Anjali Shah, Nicola Cooper, & Michel P. Coleman. (2008). Survival from adult leukaemia in England and Wales up to 2001. British Journal of Cancer. 99(S1). S116–S118. 4 indexed citations
19.
Shah, Anjali, Charles Stiller, M. G. Kenward, et al.. (2008). Childhood leukaemia: long-term excess mortality and the proportion ‘cured’. British Journal of Cancer. 99(1). 219–223. 17 indexed citations
20.
Frohman, Elliot M., Anjali Shah, Eric Eggenberger, et al.. (2007). Corticosteroids for Multiple Sclerosis: I. Application for Treating Exacerbations. Neurotherapeutics. 4(4). 618–626. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026