Anja Löw
About
In The Last Decade
Anja Löw
2 papers receiving 62 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 16
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 51
- Surgery 48
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 14
- Behavioral Neuroscience 3
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 3
Countries citing papers authored by Anja Löw
This map shows the geographic impact of Anja Löw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anja Löw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anja Löw more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anja Löw
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anja Löw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anja Löw. The network helps show where Anja Löw may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anja Löw
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anja Löw. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anja Löw based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anja Löw. Anja Löw is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 53 | |
| 4 | A randomized, comparative, animal survival study of colonic tattoing using indocyanine green or India ink | 0 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.