Anindya Halder

658 citations
38 papers · 397 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Anindya Halder

32 papers receiving 383 citations

Peers

Anindya Halder
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Health Information Management 38
  • Artificial Intelligence 198
  • Media Technology 49
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 85
  • Health Informatics 4
Replace Tamazouzt Ait Saadi with:
Tamazouzt Ait Saadi Algeria
Li Guo China
Ivica Dimitrovski North Macedonia
Seyyid Ahmed Medjahed Algeria
Feng Chu Singapore
Hanuman Verma India
Kishor K. Bhoyar India
Tahereh Hassanzadeh Australia
Shailender Kumar India
Xuebing Yang China
Anindya Halder relative to Tamazouzt Ait Saadi Algeria Tamazouzt Ait Saadi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tamazouzt Ait Saadi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anindya Halder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anindya Halder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anindya Halder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anindya Halder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anindya Halder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anindya Halder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anindya Halder. The network helps show where Anindya Halder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Anindya Halder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anindya Halder Line = papers co-authored together Anindya Halder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201955
2 200849
3 201141
4 202140
5 202331
6 201924
7 201319
8 202017
9 200916
10 201915
11 201913
12 200912
13 201411
14 20199
15 20157
16 20205
17 20225
18 20214
19 20244
20 20214

About Anindya Halder

Anindya Halder is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Media Technology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gene expression and cancer classification (8 papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (6 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (5 papers), Brain Tumor Detection and Classification (5 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (4 papers), Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers) and Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (38 citations), Artificial Intelligence (198 citations), Media Technology (49 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (85 citations) and Health Informatics (4 citations). Anindya Halder has collaborated with scholars based in India. Frequent co-authors include Susmita Ghosh, Ashish Ghosh, Moumita Roy, Utpal Biswas, Goutam Saha, Rajat Kumar Pal, Goutam Saha and Bimala P. Baruah. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Soft Computing, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Scientific Reports and International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact