Anima Bühler

465 total citations
12 papers, 335 citations indexed

About

Anima Bühler is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anima Bühler has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 335 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Ophthalmology, 5 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 3 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Anima Bühler's work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (11 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (6 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers). Anima Bühler is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Diseases and Treatments (11 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (6 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers). Anima Bühler collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Anima Bühler's co-authors include Hansjürgen Agostini, Andreas Stahl, Daniel Böhringer, Clemens Lange, Christoph Ehlken, Thomas Wecker, Günther Schlunck, Bertan Cakir, Franziska Fischer and Amelie Pielen and has published in prestigious journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Experimental Eye Research.

In The Last Decade

Anima Bühler

12 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers

Anima Bühler
Anima Bühler
Citations per year, relative to Anima Bühler Anima Bühler (= 1×) peers Yoshihiro Kaizu

Countries citing papers authored by Anima Bühler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anima Bühler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anima Bühler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anima Bühler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anima Bühler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anima Bühler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anima Bühler. The network helps show where Anima Bühler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anima Bühler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anima Bühler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anima Bühler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anima Bühler. Anima Bühler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Cakir, Bertan, Michael Reich, Stefan J. Lang, et al.. (2019). OCT Angiography of the Choriocapillaris in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Quantitative Subgroup Analysis. Ophthalmology and Therapy. 8(1). 75–86. 41 indexed citations
2.
Cakir, Bertan, Anima Bühler, Johanna M. Walz, et al.. (2018). Semaphorin 3F Modulates Corneal Lymphangiogenesis and Promotes Corneal Graft Survival. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 59(12). 5277–5277. 13 indexed citations
3.
Sun, Ye, Raffael Liegl, Yan Gong, et al.. (2017). Sema3f Protects Against Subretinal Neovascularization In Vivo. EBioMedicine. 18. 281–287. 18 indexed citations
4.
Ehlken, Christoph, et al.. (2017). Expression of Angiogenic and Inflammatory Factors in Choroidal Neovascularisation-Derived Retinal Pigment Epithelium. Ophthalmic Research. 61(3). 174–182. 6 indexed citations
5.
Çakır, B., Michael Reich, Stefan J. Lang, et al.. (2017). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der OCT-Angiografie bei Patienten mit Chorioretinopathia centralis serosa. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde. 234(9). 1161–1168. 15 indexed citations
6.
Pielen, Amelie, Anima Bühler, Sonja Heinzelmann, et al.. (2017). Switch of Intravitreal Therapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion from Anti-VEGF to Dexamethasone Implant and Vice Versa. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2017. 1–7. 11 indexed citations
7.
Cakir, Bertan, Franziska Fischer, Christoph Ehlken, et al.. (2016). Clinical experience with eplerenone to treat chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 254(11). 2151–2157. 50 indexed citations
8.
Bühler, Anima, Felicitas Bucher, Gottfried Martin, et al.. (2016). Systemic confounders affecting serum measurements of omega-3 and -6 polyunsaturated fatty acids in patients with retinal disease. BMC Ophthalmology. 16(1). 159–159. 5 indexed citations
9.
Wecker, Thomas, Christoph Ehlken, Anima Bühler, et al.. (2016). Five-year visual acuity outcomes and injection patterns in patients with pro-re-nata treatments for AMD, DME, RVO and myopic CNV. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 101(3). bjophthalmol–2016. 130 indexed citations
10.
Bucher, Felicitas, Johanna M. Walz, Anima Bühler, et al.. (2016). CNTF Attenuates Vasoproliferative Changes Through Upregulation of SOCS3 in a Mouse-Model of Oxygen-Induced Retinopathy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(10). 4017–4017. 19 indexed citations
11.
Pielen, Amelie, Daniel Böhringer, Bernd Junker, et al.. (2014). Intra- and Postoperative Risks and Complications of Small-Gauge (23-G) versus Conventional (20-G) Vitrectomy for Macular Surgery. European Journal of Ophthalmology. 24(5). 778–785. 13 indexed citations
12.
Bühler, Anima, Stefanie Berger, Fee Bengsch, et al.. (2013). Cathepsin proteases promote angiogenic sprouting and laser-induced choroidal neovascularisation in mice. Experimental Eye Research. 115. 73–78. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026