Anil Prakash
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Co-authors
- Udaya Pratap SinghHans Raj BhatSurajit Kumar GhoshDibya Ranjan BhattacharyyaKabita GogoiPrashant GahtoriJagadish MahantaCatherine Walton
- Topics
- Mosquito-borne diseases and control (24 papers)Malaria Research and Control (22 papers)Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited KingdomThailand
In The Last Decade
Anil Prakash
46 papers receiving 820 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 400
- Organic Chemistry 278
- Molecular Biology 153
- Genetics 124
- Infectious Diseases 118
Countries citing papers authored by Anil Prakash
This map shows the geographic impact of Anil Prakash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anil Prakash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anil Prakash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anil Prakash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anil Prakash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anil Prakash. The network helps show where Anil Prakash may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anil Prakash
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anil Prakash. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anil Prakash based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anil Prakash. Anil Prakash is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | In silico analysis of gall midge resistance gene Gm4 in rice cultivar PTB10 | 1 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 64 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Anil Prakash
Anil Prakash is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases and Parasitology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 850 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mosquito-borne diseases and control (24 papers), Malaria Research and Control (22 papers) and Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (400 citations), Organic Chemistry (278 citations) and Parasitology (44 citations). Anil Prakash has collaborated with scholars based in India, United Kingdom and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Udaya Pratap Singh, Hans Raj Bhat, Surajit Kumar Ghosh, Dibya Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Kabita Gogoi, Prashant Gahtori, Jagadish Mahanta, Catherine Walton, Ramendra K. Singh and Devojit Kumar Sarma. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Molecular Ecology and Frontiers in Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.