Anika Sieber

624 citations
9 papers · 521 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
    • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
    • Forest Management and Policy
  • Soil Science top 10%
    • Soil and Environmental Studies

Papers in

Anika Sieber

9 papers receiving 510 citations

Peers

Anika Sieber
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Global and Planetary Change 345
  • Soil Science 101
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 101
  • Ecology 211
  • Ecological Modeling 29
Replace Róbert Pazúr with:
Róbert Pazúr Switzerland
Amintas Brandão United States
J.A. Klijn Netherlands
Andrey Dara Germany
Lin Cassidy Botswana
Raju Rai Nepal
Joseph Maitima Kenya
Jean‐Michel Terres Italy
Carlos Hiroo Saito Brazil
Xindong Du China
Anika Sieber relative to Róbert Pazúr Switzerland Róbert Pazúr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Róbert Pazúr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anika Sieber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anika Sieber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anika Sieber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anika Sieber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anika Sieber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anika Sieber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anika Sieber. The network helps show where Anika Sieber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Anika Sieber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anika Sieber Line = papers co-authored together Anika Sieber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2013221
2 2011122
3 201361
4 201439
5 201536
6 201531
7 20179
8
The trajectories and determinants of agricultural land-use change over the last two decades in post-Soviet European Russia
20121
9 20131

About Anika Sieber

Anika Sieber is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Ecology, Political Science and International Relations and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 9 papers that have together received 521 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (6 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (5 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (3 papers), Forest Management and Policy (2 papers), Russia and Soviet political economy (1 paper), Species Distribution and Climate Change (1 paper), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (1 paper) and Remote Sensing in Agriculture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (345 citations), Soil Science (101 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (101 citations), Ecology (211 citations) and Ecological Modeling (29 citations). Anika Sieber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Volker C. Radeloff, Tobias Kuemmerle, Alexander V. Prishchepov, Patrick Hostert, Matthias Baumann, Jan Knorn, Patrick Griffiths, Eugenia Bragina, Éric F. Lambin and Florian Schierhorn. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Research Letters, Remote Sensing, Land Economics, Environmental Conservation and Remote Sensing of Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact