Anika Pflug
About
In The Last Decade
Anika Pflug
13 papers receiving 288 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Signal Processing 246
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 231
- Surgery 75
- Information Systems 74
- Artificial Intelligence 36
Countries citing papers authored by Anika Pflug
This map shows the geographic impact of Anika Pflug's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anika Pflug with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anika Pflug more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anika Pflug
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anika Pflug. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anika Pflug. The network helps show where Anika Pflug may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anika Pflug
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anika Pflug. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anika Pflug based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anika Pflug. Anika Pflug is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 139 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.