Anielle de Pina-Costa
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Parasitology top 5%
- Infectious Diseases
- Social Psychology
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- Patrícia BrasilCláudio Tadeu Daniel‐RibeiroRicardo Lourenço‐de‐OliveiraMartha Cecília Suárez-MútisAna Carolina Faria e Silva SantelliSílvia Maria Di SantiJoseli Oliveira-FerreiraDenise Anete Madureira de Alvarenga
- Topics
- Mosquito-borne diseases and control (24 papers)Malaria Research and Control (20 papers)Vector-borne infectious diseases (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilJapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Anielle de Pina-Costa
26 papers receiving 327 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 288
- Parasitology 106
- Infectious Diseases 45
- Social Psychology 36
- Ecology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Anielle de Pina-Costa
This map shows the geographic impact of Anielle de Pina-Costa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anielle de Pina-Costa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anielle de Pina-Costa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anielle de Pina-Costa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anielle de Pina-Costa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anielle de Pina-Costa. The network helps show where Anielle de Pina-Costa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anielle de Pina-Costa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anielle de Pina-Costa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anielle de Pina-Costa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anielle de Pina-Costa. Anielle de Pina-Costa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 40 |
About Anielle de Pina-Costa
Anielle de Pina-Costa is a scholar working on Parasitology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 27 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mosquito-borne diseases and control (24 papers), Malaria Research and Control (20 papers) and Vector-borne infectious diseases (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (106 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (288 citations) and Infectious Diseases (45 citations). Anielle de Pina-Costa has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Patrícia Brasil, Cláudio Tadeu Daniel‐Ribeiro, Ricardo Lourenço‐de‐Oliveira, Martha Cecília Suárez-Mútis, Ana Carolina Faria e Silva Santelli, Sílvia Maria Di Santi, Joseli Oliveira-Ferreira, Denise Anete Madureira de Alvarenga, Cristiana Ferreira Alves de Brito and Alcides Pissinatti. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and PLoS neglected tropical diseases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.