Anick Nater

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
33 papers, 937 citations indexed

About

Anick Nater is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anick Nater has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 937 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Surgery, 26 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 3 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Anick Nater's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (26 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (20 papers) and Management of metastatic bone disease (15 papers). Anick Nater is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (26 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (20 papers) and Management of metastatic bone disease (15 papers). Anick Nater collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Ireland. Anick Nater's co-authors include Michael G. Fehlings, Lindsay Tetreault, Carlo Santaguida, Arjun Sahgal, James S. Harrop, Justin S. Smith, Tom Mroz, Allan R. Martin, Charles G. Fisher and Aria Nouri and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, PLoS ONE and Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Anick Nater

31 papers receiving 921 citations

Hit Papers

The Aging of the Global Population 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 50 100 150 200 250

Peers

Anick Nater
Peter D. Angevine United States
Nikita Lakomkin United States
Rishi R. Lall United States
Todd Miller United States
Ian T. McNeill United States
Hannah E. Gilder United States
Andrew Schilling United States
Ryan Khanna United States
Seokchun Lim United States
Peter D. Angevine United States
Anick Nater
Citations per year, relative to Anick Nater Anick Nater (= 1×) peers Peter D. Angevine

Countries citing papers authored by Anick Nater

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anick Nater's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anick Nater with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anick Nater more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anick Nater

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anick Nater. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anick Nater. The network helps show where Anick Nater may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anick Nater

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anick Nater. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anick Nater based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anick Nater. Anick Nater is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hachem, Laureen D., Anick Nater, & Michael G. Fehlings. (2023). Spinal Meningiomas. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 1416. 69–78. 3 indexed citations
2.
Tetreault, Lindsay, Stefan Lange, Silky Chotai, et al.. (2021). A Systematic Review of Definitions for Dysphagia and Dysphonia in Patients Treated Surgically for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. Global Spine Journal. 12(7). 1535–1545. 7 indexed citations
4.
Nater, Anick, Arjun Sahgal, & Michael G. Fehlings. (2018). Management – spinal metastases. Handbook of clinical neurology. 149. 239–255. 36 indexed citations
8.
Nouri, Aria, Allan R. Martin, Anick Nater, et al.. (2017). Influence of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features on Surgical Decision-Making in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results from a Global Survey of AOSpine International Members. World Neurosurgery. 105. 864–874. 30 indexed citations
9.
Samuel, Nardin, Lindsay Tetreault, Carlo Santaguida, et al.. (2016). Clinical and pathological outcomes after resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a single-institution case series. Neurosurgical FOCUS. 41(2). E8–E8. 30 indexed citations
11.
12.
Nouri, Aria, Allan R. Martin, Lindsay Tetreault, et al.. (2016). MRI Analysis of the Combined Prospectively Collected AOSpine North America and International Data. Spine. 42(14). 1058–1067. 40 indexed citations
14.
Fehlings, Michael G., Lindsay Tetreault, Anick Nater, et al.. (2015). The Aging of the Global Population. Neurosurgery. 77(Supplement 1). S1–S5. 269 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Fehlings, Michael G., Anick Nater, Juan J. Zamorano, et al.. (2015). Risk Factors for Recurrence of Surgically Treated Conventional Spinal Schwannomas. Spine. 41(5). 390–398. 59 indexed citations
16.
Kumar, Rachit, Anick Nater, Sten Myrehaug, et al.. (2015). The era of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases and the multidisciplinary management of complex cases. Neuro-Oncology Practice. 3(1). 48–58. 16 indexed citations
17.
Fehlings, Michael G., Anick Nater, Jens R. Chapman, James S. Harrop, & Thomas E. Mroz. (2014). Consensus Statement. Spine. 39(22 Suppl 1). S3–S6. 2 indexed citations
18.
Fehlings, Michael G., Anick Nater, & Haley K Holmer. (2014). Cost-effectiveness of Surgery in the Management of Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression. Spine. 39(22 Suppl 1). S99–S105. 20 indexed citations
19.
Fehlings, Michael G. & Anick Nater. (2014). Development and Implementation of Guidelines in Neurosurgery. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America. 26(2). 271–282. 3 indexed citations
20.
Fehlings, Michael G., et al.. (2014). Introduction to Focus Issue. Spine. 39(22 Suppl 1). S1–S2. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026