Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to Aníbal Quijano Aníbal Quijano (= 1×)
peers
Ramón Grosfoguel
Countries citing papers authored by Aníbal Quijano
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Aníbal Quijano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aníbal Quijano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aníbal Quijano more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aníbal Quijano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aníbal Quijano. The network helps show where Aníbal Quijano may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aníbal Quijano
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aníbal Quijano.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aníbal Quijano based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Aníbal Quijano. Aníbal Quijano is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Quijano, Aníbal. (2010). La crisis del horizonte de sentido colonial/moderno/eurocentrado. 50(259). 4–15.12 indexed citations
6.
Quijano, Aníbal. (2004). El laberinto de América Latina: ¿hay otras salidas?. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México). 10(1). 75–97.13 indexed citations
7.
Quijano, Aníbal. (2002). El nuevo imaginario anticapitalista. 155–166.2 indexed citations
8.
Quijano, Aníbal. (2001). Colonialidad del poder, globalizacion y democracia. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México). 4(188). 58–123.20 indexed citations
9.
Quijano, Aníbal. (2000). El fantasma del desarrollo en América Latina. 38–55.13 indexed citations
10.
Quijano, Aníbal. (1998). La economía popular y sus caminos en América Latina.8 indexed citations
Quijano, Aníbal. (1988). A different concept of the private sector, a different concept of the public sector: notes for a Latin American debate. Americanae (AECID Library).1 indexed citations
13.
Arguedas, José María, et al.. (1985). ¿He vivido en vano? Mesa Redonda sobre Todas las Sangres, 23 de junio de 1965. Americanae (AECID Library).7 indexed citations
14.
Quijano, Aníbal. (1982). Introducción a Mariátegui.4 indexed citations
15.
Mariátegui, José Carlos, et al.. (1979). 7 [i.e. Siete] ensayos de interpretación de la realidad peruana.2 indexed citations
16.
Quijano, Aníbal. (1979). Problema agrario y movimientos campesinos.8 indexed citations
17.
Quijano, Aníbal. (1977). Dependencia, urbanización y cambio social en Latinoamérica.7 indexed citations
18.
Quijano, Aníbal. (1976). Dependencia, cambio social y urbanización en Latinoamérica. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.5 indexed citations
Quijano, Aníbal. (1967). Urbanización y tendencias de cambio en la sociedad rural en Latinoamérica. Americanae (AECID Library).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.