Andriy Danyliv
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Ciarán O’NeillFidelma DunneAngela O’DeaWim GrootMilena PavlovaLiam GlynnIrena GrygaMarie Tierney
- Topics
- Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (8 papers)Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (5 papers)Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Obstetrics and GynecologyPediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthEconomics and Econometrics
- Partner nations
- IrelandSwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Andriy Danyliv
20 papers receiving 294 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 134
- Economics and Econometrics 75
- General Health Professions 65
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 61
- Surgery 60
Countries citing papers authored by Andriy Danyliv
This map shows the geographic impact of Andriy Danyliv's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andriy Danyliv with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andriy Danyliv more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andriy Danyliv
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andriy Danyliv. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andriy Danyliv. The network helps show where Andriy Danyliv may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andriy Danyliv
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andriy Danyliv. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andriy Danyliv based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andriy Danyliv. Andriy Danyliv is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 45 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 42 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Andriy Danyliv
Andriy Danyliv is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Decision Sciences and Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (8 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (5 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (134 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (59 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (75 citations). Andriy Danyliv has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ciarán O’Neill, Fidelma Dunne, Angela O’Dea, Wim Groot, Milena Pavlova, Liam Glynn, Irena Gryga, Marie Tierney, Brian E. McGuire and Louise Carmody. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Cancer and Clinical Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.