Andrew Weems

568 total citations
10 papers, 305 citations indexed

About

Andrew Weems is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Food Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Weems has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 305 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Cell Biology and 2 papers in Food Science. Recurrent topics in Andrew Weems's work include Fungal and yeast genetics research (5 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (3 papers) and Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (2 papers). Andrew Weems is often cited by papers focused on Fungal and yeast genetics research (5 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (3 papers) and Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (2 papers). Andrew Weems collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Austria. Andrew Weems's co-authors include Michael A. McMurray, Courtney R. Johnson, Meghan Driscoll, Kevin M. Dean, Reto Fiolka, Gaudenz Danuser, Erik S. Welf, Juan Lucas Argueso, Li Du and Shi‐Long Lu and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Nature Methods and Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Weems

9 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Andrew Weems United States	9	235	113	37	31	26	10	305
E. Emily Joo Canada	5	219 0.9×	181 1.6×	21 0.6×	16 0.5×	19 0.7×	6	315
Fabien Moretto United Kingdom	8	340 1.4×	75 0.7×	15 0.4×	37 1.2×	27 1.0×	9	468
Petr Folk Czechia	14	362 1.5×	166 1.5×	8 0.2×	52 1.7×	70 2.7×	28	526
Arkadi Manukyan United States	9	236 1.0×	50 0.4×	7 0.2×	10 0.3×	28 1.1×	14	314
Karen H. White United States	9	485 2.1×	117 1.0×	5 0.1×	11 0.4×	19 0.7×	12	548
Derek C. Prosser United States	12	447 1.9×	349 3.1×	7 0.2×	9 0.3×	16 0.6×	20	583
Alejandra Fernandez‐Cid United Kingdom	10	554 2.4×	83 0.7×	7 0.2×	33 1.1×	45 1.7×	18	601
Arupratan Das United States	6	329 1.4×	294 2.6×	4 0.1×	31 1.0×	13 0.5×	8	457
Thomas G. Gligoris United Kingdom	11	919 3.9×	125 1.1×	7 0.2×	23 0.7×	19 0.7×	14	982
Rachel Terry United States	2	236 1.0×	68 0.6×	5 0.1×	32 1.0×	30 1.2×	2	356

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Weems

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Weems's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Weems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Weems more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Weems

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Weems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Weems. The network helps show where Andrew Weems may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Weems

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Weems. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Weems based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Weems. Andrew Weems is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Zhou, Felix, Zach Marin, Clarence Yapp, et al.. (2025). Universal consensus 3D segmentation of cells from 2D segmented stacks. Nature Methods. 22(11). 2386–2399.

2.

Driscoll, Meghan, Erik S. Welf, Andrew Weems, et al.. (2024). Proteolysis-free amoeboid migration of melanoma cells through crowded environments via bleb-driven worrying. Developmental Cell. 59(18). 2414–2428.e8. 12 indexed citations

3.

Weems, Andrew, Erik S. Welf, Meghan Driscoll, et al.. (2023). Blebs promote cell survival by assembling oncogenic signalling hubs. Nature. 615(7952). 517–525. 71 indexed citations

4.

Weems, Andrew, et al.. (2021). Selective functional inhibition of a tumor-derived p53 mutant by cytosolic chaperones identified using split-YFP in budding yeast. G3 Genes Genomes Genetics. 11(9). 9 indexed citations

5.

Welf, Erik S., Christopher E. Miles, Etai Sapoznik, et al.. (2020). Actin-Membrane Release Initiates Cell Protrusions. Developmental Cell. 55(6). 723–736.e8. 57 indexed citations

6.

Johnson, Courtney R., Andrew Weems, Anum Khan, et al.. (2020). Guanidine hydrochloride reactivates an ancient septin hetero-oligomer assembly pathway in budding yeast. eLife. 9. 15 indexed citations

7.

Weems, Andrew & Michael A. McMurray. (2017). The step-wise pathway of septin hetero-octamer assembly in budding yeast. eLife. 6. 53 indexed citations

8.

Johnson, Courtney R., et al.. (2015). Cytosolic chaperones mediate quality control of higher-order septin assembly in budding yeast. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 26(7). 1323–1344. 25 indexed citations

9.

Weems, Andrew, Courtney R. Johnson, Juan Lucas Argueso, & Michael A. McMurray. (2014). Higher-Order Septin Assembly Is Driven by GTP-Promoted Conformational Changes: Evidence From Unbiased Mutational Analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 196(3). 711–727. 35 indexed citations

10.

Du, Li, Jingping Shen, Andrew Weems, & Shi‐Long Lu. (2012). Role of Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase Pathway in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Journal of Oncology. 2012. 1–12. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact