Andrew Skemer
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Instrumentation top 2%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Co-authors
- Philip M. HinzDenis DefrèreLaird M. CloseVanessa P. BaileySteph SallumMark S. MarleyTimothy J. RodigasJarron Leisenring
- Topics
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (65 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (34 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (32 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Andrew Skemer
73 papers receiving 871 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 873
- Instrumentation 276
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 204
- Atmospheric Science 108
- Spectroscopy 99
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Skemer
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Skemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Skemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Skemer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Skemer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Skemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Skemer. The network helps show where Andrew Skemer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Skemer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Skemer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Skemer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Skemer. Andrew Skemer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 138 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 46 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | Planet Formation Around M-dwarf Stars: From Young Disks to Planets | 0 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Andrew Skemer
Andrew Skemer is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 80 papers that have together received 967 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (65 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (34 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (32 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (276 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (873 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (204 citations). Andrew Skemer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Philip M. Hinz, Denis Defrère, Laird M. Close, Vanessa P. Bailey, Steph Sallum, Mark S. Marley, Timothy J. Rodigas, Jarron Leisenring, Jared R. Males and Jonathan J. Fortney. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.