Andrew R. Smith
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Decision Sciences top 2%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Paul D. WindschitlJason P. RosePaul C. PriceAaron M. SchererZlatan KrižanCarolyn W. HarleyGerard M. MartinCatherine A. Hynes
- Topics
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (22 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (13 papers)Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
Andrew R. Smith
48 papers receiving 623 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Cognitive Neuroscience 157
- Sociology and Political Science 148
- General Decision Sciences 136
- Applied Psychology 116
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 107
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew R. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew R. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew R. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew R. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew R. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew R. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew R. Smith. The network helps show where Andrew R. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew R. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew R. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew R. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew R. Smith. Andrew R. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 41 | |
| 15 | 68 | |
| 16 | 37 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | Recovering pragmatism's voice : the classical tradition, Rorty, and the philosophy of communication | 23 |
| 20 | 9 |
About Andrew R. Smith
Andrew R. Smith is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 50 papers that have together received 670 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (22 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (13 papers) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (136 citations), Applied Psychology (116 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (107 citations). Andrew R. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paul D. Windschitl, Jason P. Rose, Paul C. Price, Aaron M. Scherer, Zlatan Križan, Carolyn W. Harley, Gerard M. Martin, Catherine A. Hynes, Lenore Langsdorf and Heather C. Lench. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Clinical Oncology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.