Andrew Pike
- Ecology top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Water Science and Technology top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Soil Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Frederick N. ScatenaEric M. DannerEllen WohlDavid A. BoughtonSteven T. LindleyBenjamin T. MartinR. E. SchulzeGraham Jewitt
- Topics
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies (9 papers)Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (7 papers)Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesColombia
In The Last Decade
Andrew Pike
15 papers receiving 380 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Ecology 218
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 214
- Water Science and Technology 168
- Global and Planetary Change 141
- Soil Science 55
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Pike
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Pike more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Pike
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Pike. The network helps show where Andrew Pike may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Pike
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Pike. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Pike based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Pike. Andrew Pike is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 48 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | Life cycle modeling framework for Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon | 13 |
| 6 | 60 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 43 | |
| 10 | 68 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Longitudinal patterns in stream channel geomorphology and aquatic habitat in the Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico | 12 |
| 14 | Application of digital terrain analysis to estimate hydrological variables in the Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico | 8 |
| 15 | 46 |
About Andrew Pike
Andrew Pike is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Water Science and Technology and Soil Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (9 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (7 papers) and Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (214 citations), Water Science and Technology (168 citations) and Ecology (218 citations). Andrew Pike has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Frederick N. Scatena, Eric M. Danner, Ellen Wohl, David A. Boughton, Steven T. Lindley, Benjamin T. Martin, R. E. Schulze, Graham Jewitt, J. Smithers and Forrest Melton. Their work appears in journals such as Water Resources Research, Ecology Letters and Journal of Hydrology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.